Hunting in the News: Using Dogs for That Extra Thrill

by Stephanie Ernst · 2009-01-05 12:07:00 UTC

I have two hunting-in-the-news posts for you today. First up is an NPR story from January 3 titled "Hunting with Hounds Under Fire in Virginia."

The piece, which explores the controversy over a Virginia state law that allows hunters to trespass on private property to retrieve the dogs they've used as tools to chase wild animals, talks about property rights and a bit about animal welfare. But there's no talk of animal rights, not surprisingly; there's talk about the hunters' right to retrieve the dogs they've sent out on chase (some of whom "are worth a lot of money," of course), but no mention of the dogs' interests in not being exploited, used, and placed in danger in the first place or of the fleeing animals' interests in not being killed.

The most interesting--and disturbing--comments in the story come, as they often do, from those being interviewed. "It's just like having your favorite meal or anticipating Christmas," said one hunter about the pre-kill "excited sensation." And then there was this:

The plan is to stand in a huge circle around 200 acres and turn about 20 dogs loose — urging them toward the middle.

If the hounds catch the scent of a deer, they'll track and chase the animal, and eventually it will run to the perimeter, where the nearest hunter will take a shot.

This isn't the only way to hunt deer with hounds, but hunter Cecil Robbins says it's the most exciting.

"It's the thrill of that deer coming down through the woods," he says. "When you're sitting in a stand, the deer has no idea you're there. And he walks by and it's kind of like ambushing him."

Killing an unsuspecting animal from a tree stand--that's kind of exciting. But taking a shot at a desperate animal running for her life from a pack of dogs? Now that's thrilling fun. Here we have a happy admission that these hunters don't hunt because they want or need the animals' flesh for sustenance or because they're altruistically working to solve artificial overpopulation: they are hunting primarily for the thrill of killing a fleeing, terrified animal. Of course, this motivation for hunting is no big secret, despite what hunters' groups like to say in their defense, as they try to portray hunting as some sort of noble, selfless, or (spare me, please) respectful endeavor. But it just warms the heart when every once in a while someone admits why they're really doing it.

Stephanie Ernst wrote the original Animal Rights blog at Change.org until December 2009. She can now be found at Animal Rights & AntiOppression.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Condemning Cat-Eating While Eating Cows?
NEXT STORY:
Super Bowl Countdown: 5 Actions in 5 Days to Protest Skechers' Dog Racing Ad

COMMENTS (76)

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.