Glee Skips Golden Opportunity to Talk About Sex Education

by Alex DiBranco · 2010-06-11 16:13:00 UTC

In the season finale of Glee, Quinn flashes back to the day she had sex with Puck, the moment that would transform her from cheer captain to pregnant teen. Quinn, the president of the high school Celibacy Club, asks Puck about protection. "Don't worry," he responds. "I've got it covered."

It's obvious that Quinn is not taking birth control; the protection that Puck should be using is a condom. But does he? Is Quinn one of the unlucky girls who get pregnant despite using a condom, or is Puck's response just a ploy to get laid, but he doesn't bother? (To stick with one topic, I'm not going to get into the issues of consent involved here, given that Quinn is uncertain about having sex and Puck's response is to attempt to get her to drink another wine cooler.)

We can assume that Quinn, whose uber-conservative parents kicked her out of the house when the pregnancy was revealed, didn't learn about safe sex at home. And it's also safe to assume that the Ohio high school offers a typical strain of abstinence-only education, which leaves students with zero knowledge about sex. After all, Finn believed that his sperm swam through a hot tub to impregnate Quinn. And cheerleader Britney, whose promiscuity is emphasized, nonetheless asks after being advised to use protection, "Does he mean like a burglar alarm?"

In having sex-out-of-wedlock with Puck, Quinn becomes one of the many teenage girls who engage in sexual intercourse despite abstinence-only-until-marriage classes and virginity pledges. (Puck points out that her friends Britney and Santana broke their pledge.) And when these girls do have sex, they are far less likely to use contraception, because you know what? They hardly know what it is.

Glee has done a pretty awesome job addressing the issue of sexual orientation, through Kurt's coming and his adorable dad, who struggles through his own prejudices to always stand up for his gay son. (It could do better with Britney and Santana's queerness.) Given how pissed the Religious Right is over making gay the "new normal," you know the show must be doing something right. On other key issues, it doesn't always hit the mark. And despite the ongoing storyline with Quinn struggling as a pregnant teenager, the show's writers missed a golden opportunity to address the harm done by inadequate sex education with the explicitness given to Kurt's sexuality.

There is one episode of Glee that takes a more direct approach to talking about teenagers and sex and abstinence ed. In the very second episode of the show, there's an incredible scene when Rachel joins the Celibacy Club to get closer to Finn. The irony of this club, however, is that the boys go to try to seduce the girls, and many participants are sexually active. Fed up, Rachel bursts out: "Did you know that most studies have demonstrated that celibacy doesn't work in high schools? ... The only way to deal with teen sexuality is to be prepared. That's what contraception is for."

Contraception, gasp! Quinn attacks, "Don't you dare mention the "C" word." Then Rachel crowns it off with a defense of female sexuality: "You want to know a dirty little secret that none of them want you to know? Girls want sex just as much as guys do." Thank you, Glee, for recognizing female sexuality. But from that point forward, it missed about a million opportunities to address how, duh, abstinence-only education contributed to Quinn becoming pregnant. It's a big elephant in the room to just choose to gloss over.

Photo credit: Jose Javato

Alex DiBranco is a Change.org Editor who has worked for the Nation, Political Research Associates, and the Center for American Progress. She is now based in New York City.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Florida Governor Strikes Down Mandatory Ultrasound Bill
NEXT STORY:
Fox News' Trotta Still Doesn't Get It: I Want Her Rape Apologism Off the Air

COMMENTS (1)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.