If Arizona Gets Rid of Ethnic Studies, Is Women's Studies Next?

by Brittany Shoot · 2010-05-18 09:01:00 UTC

Though I'm sure you've heard by now, last week, Arizona Governor Jan Brewer signed a law banning ethnic studies. Between curriculum battles and racial and poverty profiling that requires anyone who "looks like an immigrant" to keep papers on themselves at all times, writers around the internets have been asking the question: is the new batch of Arizona laws a feminist issue?

The obvious answer is yes. We've already chronicled what a miserable couple of months it has been for women in Arizona: from restricted abortion coverage to the specific adverse effects the law will have on Latina women, it continues to boggle the mind that so many of these proposals are signed into law by a woman. We all know that a few chromosomes don't mean much when it comes to say, ethics or protecting the civil rights of others, but the total dismissal of so many people's rights has been a blow to thousands and stirred up controversy around the country.

But banning something as vital and obvious as ethnic studies takes the conversation to a whole new place — one that too few people are having. We're not just talking about restricting access to immigrants or denying basic, legal rights to young women. We're not even talking about racial profiling. We're talking about systematically erasing people's history, making the statement that people's heritage is irrelevant, unimportant, and useless. It's really the worst type of offensive censorship, especially if you consider how much we can look to our own respective histories for lessons about navigating the future.

In thinking about this, it caused me to wonder if people would be more upset if a discipline like women's or gender studies was under attack. Would people think to care then, be outraged that half the population was being ignored? Thing is, when you remove any classification folks tend to consider "ethnic" — meaning non-white — you're also excluding half of the nation's population! How is one prejudice more egregious than another? Aren't we all in this together?

This week, we mark the 50th anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka. Perhaps it's fitting, therefore, that we rethink our approach to fighting educational discrepancies, biased teaching tools, and privilege and solidarity in the classroom. If segregated classrooms are an abomination, what do we call segregated, biased educational standards and the erasure of millions of voices from our collective history? For now, we call it Arizona.

Photo Credit: kristina sohappy

Brittany Shoot is a freelance writer, editor and critic. She's one of the editors of the Feminist Review blog and a frequent contributor to a variety of progressive publications.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Cannes Directors: 32 Years of Fame and Riches Is Punishment Enough for Polanski
NEXT STORY:
Fox News' Trotta Still Doesn't Get It: I Want Her Rape Apologism Off the Air

COMMENTS (4)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.