In Prison, Far From Home

by Matt Kelley · 2009-08-13 09:46:00 UTC

Millions of people around the world cheered when President Bill Clinton swooped into North Korea ten days ago to broker the release of Current TV reporters Laura Ling and Euna Lee. But should they have been there so long? And what about the hundreds of other Americans in dangerous prisons abroad under questionable – or straight-up unjust – charges?

In a New York Times op-ed yesterday, attorney Michael Griffith points out that it’s required under U.S. law that the President to use any means – short of war – to free Americans he believes are imprisoned abroad. The reality is more nuanced than simply following that law – there are other considerations in the international relationships involved in negotiations like this, and when the other side of the table is Iran or North Korea, war is a very real concern. But Griffith’s proposal of an office of prisoner affairs in the State Department is a good one. We should have a more organized and concerted federal policy on addressing cases of American citizens imprisoned abroad.

I’ve written here about the cases of Americans in prison abroad, and those (like Eric Volz) who were freed through international ad hoc advocacy and lobbying that drains family resources and doesn't always work. Creating a small, central office in Washington, D.C. to handle these matters would be a wise move.

The issue of overturning the countless wrongful convictions inside our borders and preventing future injustice is a separate matter, of course, and one that we must continue to focus on as well.

Matt Kelley is the Online Communications Manager at the Innocence Project and a graduate of the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University. Follow him on Twitter @mattjkelley.
PREVIOUS STORY:
After a Decade in Prison, Starting a New Life
NEXT STORY:
Make the Call! Stop the Torture of Special Needs Children in Massachusetts

COMMENTS (1)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.