Interact with the Mapping of Crisis and Response

by Daniel J Gerstle · 2010-02-16 15:19:00 UTC

Wow. Alright, I admit that I can be one of those grouchy back-to-nature, back to parchment paper, cherry wood library and quills kind of guys. But some of the new humanitarian technology -- largely developed for humanitarian goals -- is cautioning my technoclasty. Check this out. if you're new to aid work, this may blow your mind.

For some time, we aid workers had been learning about humanitarian mapping, but most of us simply leave it to the UN's ReliefWeb or the UNDP map services in national capitals to keep the libraries. We approach them when we need to:

"Hey Frank, Got a map of migration in Jonglei and Blue Nile?" "Hmm, how about one of returnee settlements and origins?" "Cool, see ya." And that was it.

But crisis mapping is getting more and more interactive, and it goes way beyond Google maps. Many aid workers are catching on, while others are being left in the dust. Take for example this satellite aided map of damage from Israel's bombing of Gaza, and a close-up. That's just the beginning. Now check out this map of earthquake damage in Port-au-Prince, Haiti. Again, primarily satellite technology.

Now comes the more recent wave. Patrick Meier and the team at Ushahidi are using crowd source technology to map out trouble spots.

For example, if a herder is tending cattle in northern Kenya and another group sweeps in to raid the cattle, that herder could theoretically text a message about what's happening to a collection center, which would triangulate it with other reports to rate its confirmability, then lay it on a map online for the government or aid agencies to track. The technology seems to have worked best in real time Haiti and even during the recent Washington, D.C. snowstorm.

Although one challenge is confirming reports, similar to the challenge of Wiki sites like Wikipedia, the bigger challenge today is mainstreaming the technical know-how. Despite the blogosphere, there are still many technoclasts and A.D.D.-types like myself that have trouble focusing on the computer screen long enough to figure this stuff out. Of course, rural communities that can really use this are getting crash courses from agencies like UNICEF. But would many of them prefer to have irrigation or shoes before a course on crowd-sourcing technology? We'll see how it grows. Definitely something to run and keep up with.

Photo credit: UNDP

Daniel J Gerstle is a journalist, human rights researcher, and humanitarian aid consultant. He is Editor and Chief Correspondent for HELO: The Crisis Story Magazine.
PREVIOUS STORY:
100% Preventable Disease, "Podo," Takes a Toll
NEXT STORY:
A letter from Bettina Siegel, "Pink Slime" petition creator

COMMENTS (0)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.