Jerking Off Into a Cup Doesn't Make You Daddy

by Alex DiBranco · 2009-12-30 16:46:00 UTC

Sperm donors and recipients beware: Ireland's Supreme Court ruled this month that the man who provided a cupful of DNA to a lesbian couple reserves rights to the child.

According to a Huffington Post article, the donor had been buddies with the couple, but when the friendship went south, he decided to assert fathering rights over the toddler. This sends serious shock waves through the foundation of families who happen to have used artificial insemination -- the donor could pop up and any moment and decide he wants to be "Daddy." Even worse, Justice Susan Denham insults the legitimacy of same-sex parenting with her justification for the ruling: "There is a benefit to a child, in general, to have the society of his father."

There is a benefit to a child, in general, to not having the composition of their family insulted and undermined by judges who ignore the fact that they already have loving parents -- the people who have been raising them. What if the parenting couple in question had been a man and a woman, but they used a donor because he was sterile? Would the judge still have argued that they should make it a ménage à trois and include a second DNA-driven father in the mix?

In the United States, judges have luckily upheld the rights of the true parents, deeming the donors' efforts to insert themselves after birth harmful to the children and their sense of family. Seems to me like donating sperm should be a pretty straightforward issue: if you're not comfortable with a kid running about with half your DNA, don't give away your semen. And if you're wondering why I said "beware" to sperm donors, too, it's because men who play by the rules of sperm donation could end up discovering the meaning of "no good deed goes unpunished."

If you start saying that sperm donors have the rights of a parent, logically they have the responsibilities of a parent as well. Men who provide sperm and expect to help another family get started while they go on their merry way could get hit with thousands of dollars child support payments or college tuition bills later.

That's enough to make any donation-minded men keep sending the juice from his special alone time safely into a sock.

Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.

Alex DiBranco is a Change.org Editor who has worked for the Nation, Political Research Associates, and the Center for American Progress. She is now based in New York City.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Models Strike Against Death-Defying 10-Inch Stiletto
NEXT STORY:
Fox News' Trotta Still Doesn't Get It: I Want Her Rape Apologism Off the Air

COMMENTS (1)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.