Junk-food Taxes vs. Healthy-food Subsidies

by Katherine Gustafson · 2010-03-02 09:04:00 UTC
Topics:

So here's a question: Which of the two things in this post's title do you figure will improve the nutritional quality of the groceries an average American might buy at the grocery store? Basically it amounts to a contest between making bad-for-you food more expensive and making healthy food less expensive.

According to a new study in the journal Psychological Science, the taxes win out over the subsidies. (H/T Tom Laskawy at Grist for pointing us to the article about it at Science Daily.) A group of psychological scientists led by Leonard Epstein of University of Buffalo asked volunteers, all of them mothers, to "shop" at a fake a grocery store for food ranging from fruit and veggies to soda and chips, which was posted with nutritional information.

The first time the volunteers shopped, the food was priced as usual at a grocery store, but the next few times, the scientists priced the food in keeping with either taxes or subsidies. For the "tax" scenario, they raised the prices of unhealthy foods by 12.5 percent, and in the "subsidy" scenario, they lowered prices on healthy foods by 25 percent.

The results? The mothers purchased healthier foods when the junk food was taxed than when the healthy food was subsidized. As Science Daily puts it, "taxing unhealthy foods reduced overall calories purchased, while cutting the proportion of fat and carbohydrates and upping the proportion of protein in a typical week's groceries." Not too shabby a result.

On the other hand, not only did subsidizing healthy food not inspire a healthier grocery haul, it actually resulted in the mothers purchasing more calories without increasing the nutritional value of their total purchase.

So, people will certainly buy more healthy food when it's cheaper, but that won't stop them from also buying the unhealthy food to go along with it. Unless, that is, that food goes up in price. Let's face it; people like their soda and their chips and their snack cakes.

What's a health-concerned nation to do? We want to get healthy but a whole lot of people hate the idea of more taxes on food, especially "sin taxes" that feel like the invisible hand of their mother. I've got an idea: How about we start by eliminating the subsidies on corn and soy that are keeping all those unhealthy foods artificially cheap in the first place?

Photo: Mike Licht, NotionsCapital.com

Katherine Gustafson is a freelance writer and editor with a background in international nonprofit organizations.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Community Supported Agriculture in NYC and Beyond
NEXT STORY:
Join the Social Media Day of Action to Rid Girl Scout Cookies of Forest-Destroying Palm Oil

COMMENTS (1)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.