Learning How To Fail

by Nathaniel Whittemore · 2009-10-27 08:41:00 UTC

One of the most important aspects of being a successful entrepreneur is learning how to fail. Whether it's a messed up grant proposal, shifting team dynamics, or dealing with different stakeholder expectations, perhaps the most vital skill of a successful entrepreneur is adaptation. Today in San Francisco, the SNAP Summit is convening to ask how leading tech entrepreneurs have failed, and then put the lessons they learned back into practice.

The tech industry is an interesting one to learn from. In many ways, it's more structured to deal with failure than any other field. Venture capital expects that most of it's investments just simply won't pan out. Founders who have a failure or two under their belt often times have a much better ability to get people to support them, because the learning from failure is respected.

Of course, the stakes of failure are somewhat lower in the web 2.0 world then they can be in the international development space. When an organization begins to create an expectation of a certain resource, and people start to plan their work and world's around that resource, the results of failure can be extremely damaging.

Still, it will be interesting to see what lessons from a "pro-failure" industry like the internet can be applied to the social enterprise space. I'm still in Maine post Pop!Tech, but we'll have a guest post later from one of my team at Assetmap, who has herself lots of experience with human rights and social justice issues. Stay tuned.

Photo: Twitter's famous "Fail Whale" - displayed whenever the site goes down.

Nathaniel Whittemore is the founder of Assetmap. Previously he was the founding director of the Northwestern University Center for Global Engagement.
PREVIOUS STORY:
My Favorite Content from Pop!Tech 2009
NEXT STORY:
Facing Forward: The End of the Social Entrepreneurship Blog on Change.org

COMMENTS (3)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.