Media Plea Leads to Child Soldier's Release in Burma

by Michelle . · 2010-02-04 09:04:00 UTC
Topics:

Even hardened military dictators resent bad press. In Burma, a child soldier was returned to his mother after she made appeals to international media outlets.

Sandar Win's 14-year-old son was one of many children forcibly recruited by the Burmese military, but unlike his fellow child soldiers in the ranks of the national army, he was released by the government after Ms. Win pleaded for his return on BBC's Burmese Service and Radio Free Asia (RFA). The military junta that rules Burma is among the most iron-fisted in the world -- perhaps second only to North Korea in its control of the media and flow of people in and out of the country.

The regime is also notorious for its use of child soldiers and its violent repression of political dissidents and ethnic minority groups. Many experts believe that the violence perpetrated by the government amounts to crimes against humanity, if not genocide.

"Name and shame" tactics are often accused of pushing hard-line, repressive dictators (and other assorted unsavory characters) further into unflinchingly extreme positions, but sometimes "shedding a light" and drawing public attention to their abusive policies can be incredibly effective. An accurate judgment on which tactics to deploy in each situation is far more art than science -- and a difficult one, at that.

The unfortunate thing about this case, however, is that it is an isolated one -- the greater problem of the pervasive use of child soldiers by the Burmese military has been much harder to address.

Photo credit: Kaunda

Michelle . has been involved in various activist endeavors, including the Teach Against Genocide pilot campaigns.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Why the IMF Keeps Lending to Haiti -- Really
NEXT STORY:
Campaign about Apple Factories in China Gains Wide and Diverse Support

COMMENTS (0)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.