Medical Marijuana: Poor People Need Not Apply?

by Chris Cassidy · 2010-08-06 11:47:00 UTC

How often do you hear of a good idea coming out of Washington, D.C.?

Last year, the federal District of Columbia didn't just join 14 states in legalizing medical marijuana — the city went one step further to try and make it accessible to folks in need. The city enacted a sliding price scale that charges low-income patients lower prices.

By expanding access to medical marijuana, we're extending the American dream  to folks like Megan Skipper — a low-income, HIV-positive D.C. resident who relies on medical marijuana. She says it quells her nausea caused by the other drugs she takes to extend her life, permitting her to eat. According to Change.org's Megan Cottrell, Skipper's limited budget only permits her to spend minimal amounts to fill her medical marijuana prescription. D.C.'s sliding scale approach to medical pot makes access to care much more viable for folks like Skipper.

The sliding scale principle hasn't yet caught on: across the 14 states that permit medical marijuana, there is presently no requirement that dispensaries make the drug accessible to indigent patients. However, Berkeley, Calif. voters may adopt a D.C.-style approach this November, and others should follow D.C.'s humane example as well. Medical marijuana shouldn't just be a privilege reserved for the well-to-do.

Join me and other Change.org readers in demanding that medical marijuana states make the drug available to those who need it, and not just those who can afford to pay.

Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons

Chris Cassidy writes on law, judicial nominations and the Constitution as they pertain to criminal justice reform and women's rights.
PREVIOUS STORY:
After Five Years in Jail, Set Free Without an Apology
NEXT STORY:
Make the Call! Stop the Torture of Special Needs Children in Massachusetts

COMMENTS (5)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.