Meg Whitman’s Track Record With Women of Color

If you’re following the California gubernatorial race, you’ve more than likely seen the headlines about candidate Meg Whitman’s “nanny problem,” as Politico.com put it. Apparently, when Whitman learned that her longtime housekeeper Nicky Diaz Santillan was an undocumented immigrant, she fired Santillan. Now Santillan has filed a lawsuit against the woman who employed her for nine years, asking for back wages and unreimbursed mileage.

Because her former housekeeper alleges that Whitman knew all along that she was undocumented but abruptly dismissed her upon entering the gubernatorial race, the media is making this out to be an immigration controversy. And who can blame them, especially since as recently as Tuesday Whitman said during a debate with rival Jerry Brown that employers who hire undocumented immigrants should be held responsible. But I have a different take. I’m concerned about Whitman’s track record with women of color in her employ.

Santillan isn’t just asking for back pay from Whitman, after all. She’s alleging that working for Whitman was a “nightmare," according to lawyer Gloria Allred. During a press conference Wednesday, Allred said that Whitman "exploited, disrespected, humiliated, and emotionally and financially abused” Santillan. The former housekeeper, who appeared by Allred’s side, tearfully accused Whitman of treating her as if she were not human.

I’m sure some of you are skeptical. “Cry me a river,” you’re thinking. It’s easy to write this off as another scandal fueled by the politics of “personal destruction,” as Whitman described it. But before you dismiss Santillan as a money-hungry opportunist, consider that she’s not the first female employee of color Whitman has had trouble with. Although Whitman called her former housekeeper’s charges meritless, she has not denied initiating a physical altercation with a Korean-American employee named Young Mi Kim in June 2007.

Then, Whitman was eBay’s president and CEO. Kim was prepping Whitman for a news interview with Reuters when Whitman reportedly cursed at and shoved Kim because she felt the employee hadn’t adequately equipped  her to be interviewed. Kim responded to the incident by getting a lawyer but ultimately settled the matter with Whitman out of court.

Whitman’s take on the incident?  “In any high-pressure working environment, tensions can surface," she said in a statement in June. “Young Mi and I had a professional disagreement, which we put behind us. She and I continued to work together at eBay...”

I’ve no doubt that stress in the workplace leads to conflict, but it doesn’t usually lead to violence. Moreover, I’m curious as to why the employees Whitman’s been accused of mistreating are women of color. I don’t know if Whitman really emotionally abused and exploited Santillan, nor do I know what led her to shove Kim, but I’ve little doubt that if a white male candidate had this alleged history with minority women, more controversy would’ve followed these charges.

Unfortunately, women of color remain at the bottom of the totem pole in the American workplace. If Whitman has indeed treated these vulnerable American workers any differently than, say, her white male employees, it’s a huge red flag about her character. Moreover, one of the most prominent candidates to endorse Whitman is a woman of color herself—Condoleezza Rice.

How would Whitman treat Rice if she were in her employ?

Photo Credit: Erik Hersman

Nadra Kareem Nittle has written about race for a variety of media outlets, including the Los Angeles Times' Inland Valley edition and the El Paso Times.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Africa in Peaces: The Top UN Peacebuilder Teaches
NEXT STORY:
A letter from Bettina Siegel, "Pink Slime" petition creator

COMMENTS (4)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.