Michigan's Canned Hunt Ranches Fight to Keep Exotic Swine Legal

by Pamela Black · 2011-06-10 09:50:00 UTC
Topics:

The feral swine problem in Michigan has gotten so out of control that the state wants to declare the animals an invasive species in the hopes of stopping the damage that the exploding population of pigs can cause to the ecosystem and farms. Michigan Department of Natural Resources and Environment is so anxious to get rid of them that hunting feral swine is allowed 365 days a year.

These animals originated from game ranches, where they were imported for hunters to shoot in fenced-in areas. With these massive swine, escape from the fences is not a matter of if, but when. As a result of these escapes, feral swine have been confirmed in at least 69 of Michigan's 83 counties.

An invasive species designation would prevent any ownership of Eurasian boars and razorbacks that are imported or bred locally for use as trophy hunts at canned hunt ranches. No stranger to hunting controversy, Ted Nugent is a very vocal supporter of the canned hunt industry. As an owner of one of these businesses, he wants to preserve the lucrative trophy swine hunt opportunity.

Nugent is quickly becoming known for his recent statement on the issue when visiting the State Capitol: "People have lost their minds in Michigan. If there are 7,000 pigs running around Michigan, I'm a gay banjo player in a hee-haw band." The Nuge is lobbying for regulation instead of a ban.

Proposed laws have been introduced in both the House and the Senate. They include a number of bills that are packaged together as the “Sport Swine Marketing Act” to transfer regulatory authority from MDNRE, which oversees every other wildlife species eligible for hunting, to the Department of Agriculture, where the regulations for breeding and hunting facilities would be much more lenient. (Punishment for violating regulations would include warnings or $300 fines.)

Not only do environmental groups prefer a total ban of swine over regulation, many in the agricultural community want these exotic swine declared illegal as well. Dennis de Young, President of the Michigan Pork Producers Association, equates feral swine to the potential Asian carp invasion in the Great Lakes. Government agencies are not willing to regulate the exotic fish; the risks are too high. Instead, there is considerable effort to keep the fish out of the lakes altogether.

De Young believes banning is the only way to confront the feral swine problem, too. “The Legislature's proposal will effectively make it easier and more lucrative for hunt clubs to import an invasive species into Michigan that endangers our entire agriculture industry,” he told the Kalamazoo Gazette.

Exotic swine ownership could easily have been made illegal back in September, but Michigan decided to delay the law until July 2011 to give the canned hunt ranches an opportunity to set up their own regulations.

With the deadline looming, the canned hunt industry is scrambling to pass laws that will allow them to continue business as usual. Unfortunately, “business as usual” is what led to thousands of escaped swine wreaking havoc throughout the state. But if they fail to pass these new laws by July, the ban will go into effect, keeping wildlife policy out of the hands of special interests.

July will be here before we know it. Tell Michigan that you don’t agree with allowing canned hunt ranches to dictate wildlife policy.

Photo Credit: Nicholas R Horne

Pamela Black has nearly a decade of experience with animal non-profit organizations and has a Masters' degree in Animals and Public Policy.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Cleveland Rejects Canine Profiling, State of Ohio Could Be Next
NEXT STORY:
Petitions Delivered Around the World for Release of Indonesian Circus Dolphins

COMMENTS (1)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.