Moving Beyond Transaction Thinking

by Nathaniel Whittemore · 2009-10-24 09:47:00 UTC

One of the recurring themes of speakers at Pop!Tech, whether stated as such or not, is the notion that success in the future means re-learning to think beyond transactions.

First, a framework. In the commercial world, transactions are the way we do businesses. One party has one type of value that another wants, and that other person has an ability to trade a different type of value to the first party. Money becomes the proxy for this exchange. The value of the two items exchanged is determined immediately. This sort of transaction is the way that a huge number of our material, consumptive relationships progress.

Community is a bit different. Participants in communities of all kinds expect that the community is a source of strength, or value, for them. But to derive value from most communities, participants have to give in a way that is not transactional. You contribute to people within a community without knowing exactly how that value is going to come back to you. The currency is trust - or to use a more wonky term, social capital.

Two interesting places today where the notion of transaction has come up are YouTube and our Food System.

Kansas State University researcher Michael Wesch talked about how the community on YouTube responds to vulnerability and openness. But YouTube is fundamentally a-commercial for most content producers, at least in the sense that they're not being rewarded financially in a transaction based system. Of course, they are still deriving an immense amount of value - however they define it.

Michael Pollan, food researcher and author of "The Omnivore's Dilemma," and "In Defense of Food," gave an amazing overview of the food system. Perhaps the most profound observation was his assessment that people view themselves in a zero-sum relationship with nature; that when we take, nature is deleteriously impacted. That's the transaction thinking, except that nature has no say in the value it derives. Instead, Pollan urged us to think of ourselves in an ongoing, complex, and give and take relationship with nature that extends over time.

Food for thought. Pun Intended.

(Photo: Muffet)

Nathaniel Whittemore is the founder of Assetmap. Previously he was the founding director of the Northwestern University Center for Global Engagement.
PREVIOUS STORY:
The Conference Is Dead (...Does Anyone Care?)
NEXT STORY:
Facing Forward: The End of the Social Entrepreneurship Blog on Change.org

COMMENTS (0)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.