Nestle Dumps Its Palm Oil Provider...But Might Take Him Back

by Sarah Parsons · 2010-05-18 14:00:00 UTC

Talk about one messy breakup. Back in March, Nestle said it would drop its palm oil provider, Sinar Mas, after Greenpeace exposed how the Indonesian company clear-cut rainforest and peatland to plant palm plantations. Then yesterday, the food giant took its commitment even further, partnering with The Forest Trust to completely cut from its supply chain any company that "owns or manages high-risk plantations or farms linked to deforestation." Greenpeace glowed, environmentalists applauded, and we're guessing Indonesia's wildlife danced a jig, too. But not so fast—the drama continues.

On the same day Nestle announced it was fully committing to a zero-deforestation footprint, one of its execs was feeling some breakup remorse. Bloomberg and Agence-France Presse quoted Nestle exec Jose Lopez as saying that the company may resume purchasing palm oil from Sinar Mas if an "independent" review disproves Greenpeace's claim. Greenpeace says it worries the groups Sinar Mas appointed to conduct said review, Control Union Certification and BSI Group, will produce biased results. The report—biased or not—will be ready in July.

There's clearly a lot of he-said-she-said going on, which most folks (myself included) don't have a whole lot of tolerance for. But despite the setback, I think it's important to see the silver lining. Consumer demand forced Nestle, the largest food company in the world, to agree to adopt more environmentally sustainable business practices. And not only Nestle—the same Greenpeace campaign prompted Unilever and Kraft to drop Sinar Mas, too.

Greenpeace started pressuring Nestle in March, creating a social media firestorm against the company and its use of palm oil. Within weeks of the campaign's launch, Nestle agreed to give Sinar Mas the heave-ho. Add major corporations like Unilever and Kraft to the mix, and it's clear that we as consumers don't have to sit back and let our food providers engage in unsustainable operations. We actually have a whole lot of power, so long as we collectively organize.

It's encouraging to see how far social media drove this campaign, and it doesn't have to stop with Sinar Mas. Palm oil plantations across Indonesia and Malaysia engage in similar deforestation methods, wreaking havoc on ecosystems and putting species like orangutans in peril. President Obama is set to visit Indonesia in June. Encourage him to pressure the Indonesian government to set up necessary protections for rainforests by taking part in this petition.

Photo credit: Achmad Rabin Taim via Wikimedia Commons

Sarah Parsons is Change.org's Sustainable Food Editor. Her work has appeared in Popular Science, OnEarth, Audubon and Plenty.
PREVIOUS STORY:
EPA Puts the Kibosh on Pesticides Near Salmon Streams
NEXT STORY:
Join the Social Media Day of Action to Rid Girl Scout Cookies of Forest-Destroying Palm Oil

COMMENTS (6)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.