Nestle to Barge Junk Food Up the Amazon in "Sailing Supermarket"

by Tara Lohan · 2010-06-23 16:40:00 UTC

Just because you live in the far reaches of the Amazon doesn't mean you should be denied access to such staples as Baby Ruths® and Raisinets.® Or so goes the thinking of Nestle,  which is intent to not let Unilever best them in bringing junk food to the world's poor, a group also known as "emerging markets."

Michele Simon, blogging at Appetite for Profit, calls Nestle out on plans to use large barges to market goods on two Amazon river tributaries. Bloomberg News, which originally posted the story, described Nestle's strategy as "sailing a supermarket barge," although I'd like to question the use of the word "supermarket" here. Last time I checked, most supermarkets carried more that just processed foods. These barges sound a lot like the ice-cream trucks or crappy corner stores that provide some of the only access to food in poorer neighborhoods in the U.S., much to the detriment of the residents there who are in need of affordable, sustainable choices.

The barges are to carry "300 different goods including chocolate, yogurt, ice cream, and juices," according to Bloomberg, which doesn't sound like the makings of a well-balanced diet. But Nestle says it's also going to remedy that situation by adding extra "nutrients" to products, which is almost comical if it weren't so sad. It's great to see someone thinking outside the box about access to food, but disappointing that it's a profit-driven, junk food company.

Apparently Nestle sees big money in targeting some of the world's most economically disenfranchised, and they've got a clever strategy for how to get people with very little money to spend it on crap. The company's adapted their products to be sold in smaller packages "to make them more accessible to low-income shoppers," Bloomberg points out.

Simon clarifies that this tactic is borrowed from the tobacco industry, which sells single cigarettes in developing countries to try to get people hooked on their product even if they can't afford to buy a whole pack, a practice that's been disallowed in most places.

Of course Nestle is not the only junk food company to turn up the heat in the developing world. I wrote recently about how Coke and Pepsi are doing their part to spread obesity to India and China, investing billions in those countries. Nestle also hasn't neglected efforts in the U.S. and the company's made keen profits by tapping spring water in economically vulnerable rural communities. The small town of McCloud, California recently sent Nestle packing after a six-year fight to keep the multinational's paws off their mountain spring water. Battles continue against Nestle across the U.S., including prolonged fights in Michigan and Maine.

Of course Nestle will continue to go where there is money to be made—one can only hope their latest junk food imperialism is a sinking ship.

Photo credit: David Boyle

Tara Lohan is a senior editor at AlterNet.org where she heads up the environment, water, and food sections. Her work has appeared on the websites of The Nation, Mother Jones, the Huffington Post and in Yes! Magazine.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Lion Burger: The Most Unsustainable Meat Ever
NEXT STORY:
Join the Social Media Day of Action to Rid Girl Scout Cookies of Forest-Destroying Palm Oil

COMMENTS (4)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.