Obama Rejects Legally Enforceable Rules for Immigrant Detainees
From the NY Times yesterday:
The Obama administration has refused to make legally enforceable rules for immigration detention, rejecting a federal court petition by former detainees and their advocates and embracing a Bush-era inspection system that relies in part on private contractors.
The decision, contained in a six-page letter received by the plaintiffs this week, disappointed and angered immigration advocacy organizations around the country. They pointed to a stream of newly available documents that underscore the government’s failure to enforce minimum standards it set in 2000, including those concerning detainees’ access to basic health care, telephones and lawyers, even as the number of people detained has soared to more than 400,000 a year.
This decision puts the Obama administration's commitment to rule of law for immigrant detainees in doubt. Predictability, transparency, and regularity are all undermined by the current absence of binding rules regarding treatment of detainees.
The fact that DHS responded as it did, and only after being ordered to do so by a federal judge after stonewalling advocates on this issue for two and a half years, does not say good things about the administration's approach to immigration detention. "Trust us, we will do what is right," is not a viable model where the government forcibly imprisons an already-vulnerable population. Especially when there is ample evidence that DHS does not do what is right. This appears to be another instance where "continuity" with the Bush administration, not "change," is the watchword for Obama's DHS.







COMMENTS (19)