Overpopulation: The Real Inconvenient Truth

by Nikki Gloudeman · 2010-10-19 09:00:00 UTC

When it comes to the environment, overpopulation is the elephant in the room. It doesn’t matter how much we recycle, buy hybrid cars, or install solar panels on our rooftops—without addressing our swelling population and its impact on a limited stash of resources, we’re, well, screwed.

Now comes proof of just how much good we could do by controlling our populace: A recently-released study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences reveals that if we slowed global population, we could cut emissions an incredible 16 to 29 percent by 2050 and even more steeply by the end of the century.

So why, despite the mounting evidence, do we continue to sidestep the issue of overpopulation? There are several reasons, the most basic being that it’s a tricky topic to broach. In a recent Mother Jones article, Julia Whitty reported that the carbon legacy of one American child and her offspring is 20 times greater than every other sustainable maternal choice combined. The problem is, those other sustainable choices are a lot less personal, and so are much easier to preach about. (Put another way: “Don’t have kids!” is a tough sell).

The controversial issue of family planning also comes into play. In a recent post, Change.org blogger Ben Proffer shared that almost 40 percent of pregnancies worldwide are unplanned, and 123 million women have an unmet need for family planning. But the best tools at our disposal to combat this—legalizing abortion and making contraceptives widely available—are two of the thorniest social, political and religious issues around.

In light of the complicated nature of the issue—eloquently described by Whitty as “The Last Taboo”—it seems the best recourse we have is simply to stop ignoring it. Not everyone will make the same choices when it comes to overpopulation, and there’s no way to mandate its control on a global scale. But by acknowledging overpopulation is a Big Problem, we can prompt people to ponder the choices they make, and governments to pass measures to help.

In other words, it’s time to acknowledge the elephant. And you can start by signing a petition in support of the Global Sexual and Reproductive Health Act, which would strengthen and expand U.S. foreign assistance for family planning and reproductive health programs in developing nations.

Photo credit: David Crow/Wikimedia Commons

Follow Change.org's Environment page on Facebook and Twitter.

Nikki Gloudeman is a senior fellow at Mother Jones magazine where she writes about the environment and other topics.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Greenwash or Hogwash? "We Agree" That Chevron's New Ads Are Both
NEXT STORY:
Stopping the Water Grab in Nevada

COMMENTS (2)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.