Publix Says: Atrocities in Our Supply Chain? None of Our Business

by Alex DiBranco · 2010-12-16 12:56:00 UTC

As one of the largest supermarket chains in the country, you'd think Publix could afford a competent PR person. But the most recent statement from Media and Community Relations Manager Dwaine Stevens suggests otherwise: he said that Publix just doesn't care if there are "atrocities" being committed against the workers who grow the food they sell.

The Coalition of Immokalee Workers (CIW) put together a groundbreaking deal with the Florida Tomato Growers Exchange to protect workers, many of them immigrants, from human rights violations, enslavement, and exploitation. Then CIW went to Publix, asking them to sign onto their Campaign for Fair Food, which would increase workers' wages by a penny per pound of tomatoes and institute safeguards against slavery and exploitation. At a recent Publix grand opening in Alabama, students and workers should up to rally and demand that Publix listen to consumer desires to buy food untainted by slavery, Amanda Kloer reports on End Human Trafficking.

Publix responded that they had no intention of meeting with CIW. Not because they think everything in their supply chain is a-okay, but because "If there are some atrocities going on, it’s not our business." That's right: they aren't saying there are no atrocities in the food they sell to consumers. They aren't even attempting to allege that they can't do anything against the atrocities that, yeah, might be there. Publix is just wants to pass the buck and say: Exploitation? Slavery? Atrocities? Not our business.

But CIW and other concerned consumers say: yes it is. It's not acceptable to simply say: Well, I'm not the one directly committing atrocities. I just buy from and thus support people who might be committing atrocities. See, can't blame me. Aren't I tricky?

That just doesn't fly. Publix makes decisions about where to spend its money, and what kind of products to sell. It can take a stand and decide not to support the exploitation or enslavement of thousands of workers over the last decade. Corporations must take responsibility for the human rights violations they fund with their dollars. But despite admitting that there might be "some atrocities" involved in the food they sell, the people at Publix aren't even willing to sit down with CIW and discuss what can be done.

Consumers must let Publix know they want their food to be slave-free. Maybe when they start losing customers over their callous stand on human rights they'll realize this is their business, even if they're only motivated by their bottom line rather than by the desire to stop atrocities from being committed.

Photo credit: liz west

Alex DiBranco is a Change.org Editor who has worked for the Nation, Political Research Associates, and the Center for American Progress. She is now based in New York City.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Youth Leader and Church Volunteer Faces Deportation in Just a Few Days
NEXT STORY:
Community Members Fight Detention of High School Graduate with a Mental Disability

COMMENTS (4)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.