Questions About Chelation's "Safety" Arise Again

by Kristina Chew · 2009-03-16 23:47:00 UTC
Topics:

ETDA molecule from http://healthpsych.psy.vanderbilt.edu/
Chelation is one of the numerous biomedical treatments that parents of autistic children have turned to, in the hopes of "treating" their child. Numerous concerns have been raised about the safety of chelation; last year, an NIMH study was called off for this very reason. The March 13th News Channel 5 raises concerns about chelation after the death last year of 6-year-old Anna Starr, who had epilepsy. An autopsy stated that Anna's death was "natural" and caused by a seizure disorder. However:

But, nearly a year later, investigators served a search warrant on what used to be the Center For Proactive Medicine, a clinic on music row [in Nashville]. The warrant raises questions about the role alternative therapies played in Anna's death.

Investigators were looking for evidence of child abuse and criminally negligent homicide.

According to the search warrant, Anna received chelation therapy, an alternative treatment for epilepsy, just days before she died.

In an interview, Anna's parents, Fred and Sarah Starr, who are both doctors, claimed that Anna's 2 1/2 year old brother "no longer had autism because of a series of alternative therapies"; 2 1/2 is an age when children tend to be diagnosed with autism.

On August 23, 2005, Abubakar Tariq Nadama died after receiving treatment in the office of Pennsylvania Dr. Roy Kerry. Some discussion of the the role of chelation in Abubakar's death is here on an Autism Vox post I wrote from July of 2007.

PREVIOUS STORY:
If Roy Blunt Doesn't Care, Why Should I?
NEXT STORY:
Why I'm Asking Aetna to Cover My Surgery

COMMENTS (7)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.