Red Cross, Oxfam Warn of Cuts in Humanitarian Funding

by Michael Bear · 2008-11-23 19:59:00 UTC
Topics:

The impact of the global financial crisis is beginning to make itself felt, as humanitarian and development agencies warn of impending cuts.

According to an article in the Financial Times, the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) "is considering cutting staff and shelving projects as it braces for recession-hit donors to slash aid contributions."

For its part, Oxfam is "planning to make cost savings of 10-15 per cent while shedding 5-7 per cent of its UK staff."

The article also provides a historical perspective - "During the 1990-1993 downturn, global aid spending fell by a quarter and did not recover to 1992 levels until 2003."

Earlier this month, the UN warned of possible cuts in foreign assistance of "up to a third or more".

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon again echoed these concerns when announcing the launch of the UN's most recent humanitarian appeal last week: "The global financial crisis has raised inevitable concerns that there could be a decline in humanitarian funding for 2009. I urge member states and private donors not to let that happen."

The UN is appealing for seven billion dollars to fund humanitarian operations in 2009 - this is almost double the amount requested last year, in response to the rising food costs and escalating conflicts in countries such as Congo and Somalia.

According to the introduction to the Humanitarian Appeal for 2009:

"The $7 billion that aid agencies jointly seek can meet the most pressing needs of 30 million people in Central Africa Republic, Chad, Cote d'Ivoire, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Iraq, Kenya, the occupied Palestinian territory, Somalia, Sudan, Uganda, West Africa, and Zimbabwe.  This may seem like a huge burden for donor countries, but in fact it translate, for every hundred dollars of the rich countries' national income, to just a few cents of aid - a few cents that can ensure the survival, protection, and well-being of the poorest and most vulnerable people in this world."

[Emphasis added thanks to UN Dispatch.]

Major recipients would include Sudan ($2.1 billion, including Darfur), Somalia ($919 million), Congo ($831 million), Zimbabwe ($550 million), Iraq and neighboring countries ($547 million), and the occupied Palestinain territories ($462 million).

For previous posts about the impact of the financial crisis on humanitarian funding, see here.

[Photo of women waiting to receive food aid in Ethiopia from the Daily Telegraph]

Michael Bear
PREVIOUS STORY:
What Will You Give Up to Stop Genocide?
NEXT STORY:
A letter from Bettina Siegel, "Pink Slime" petition creator

COMMENTS (2)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.