Rep. Gutierrez Green Lights Including Same-Sex Couples in Immigration Reform

by Prerna Lal · 2010-05-26 06:00:00 -0700

This week, Rep. Luis Gutierrez held a press conference to finally show his support for including the Uniting American Families Act as part of broader immigration overhaul, a complete reversal from his previous position of throwing LGBT families under the bus.

Most Americans are probably unaware that same-sex marriage does not provide immigration benefits to a couple even if they get a marriage license in a state that allows same-sex marriage. This is due to the fact that immigration laws are a matter of federal jurisdiction (someone tell that to Arizona) and the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) disallows federal recognition of marriage.

The Uniting American Families Act provides a crucial fix to this problem without overturning DOMA. The proposed legislation permits "permanent partners" of United States citizens and legal residents to obtain legal status in the same manner as spouses of heterosexual citizens and green-card holders.

A few months ago, Rep. Gutierrez was defending his decision to exclude same-sex binational couples from a comprehensive immigration reform package. He reasoned that "there has never been a serious, in-depth discussion between the gay and lesbian community and the immigrant community" and therefore, the exclusion of LGBT families was acceptable.

It's refreshing to see Rep. Gutierrez change his mind on this issue and call for a "truly inclusive" reform, although this phoenix rising may be a too late to pass a comprehensive legislation this year. While the window of opportunity is certainly closed until after midterm elections, UAFA advocates should still rejoice at this important breakthrough.

As a little backgrounder, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops recently endorsed the Democrat proposal for comprehensive immigration reform as a crucial first step, but couldn't resist taking a swipe at the one-line provision for LGBT family equality, as in the Uniting American Families Act. Ironically, the Bishops also stated in the same press release that "this issue can no longer wait and should not be politicized or held hostage to ideology." I wonder how they negotiate the contradictory statements.

Later the National Association of Evangelicals Lobbyist released an ad in Roll Call in support of immigration reform, but opposed to the inclusion of same-sex couples in the bill. Additionally, they state that they have spoken to Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and appear pretty confident that the UAFA language would not make it into the bill. When Immigration Equality was asked for clarification on the matter, they held steadfast to the claim that UAFA was still very much a part of comprehensive immigration reform.

Sadly, this war of words is pointless as long as the Obama Administration insists on pursuing Bush-era enforcement-only solutions with comprehensive immigration reform nowhere in sight.

Photo Credit: Fibonacci Blue

Prerna Lal is co-founder and Online Coordinator of DreamActivist and a board member of Immigration Equality. She is currently attending George Washington University Law School.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Stop the Deportation of DREAM Act Youth Selvin Arevalo
NEXT STORY:
Community Members Fight Detention of High School Graduate with a Mental Disability

COMMENTS (0)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.