Republicans Try to Stop Gay Marriage in Washington, D.C.

by Michael Jones · 2010-01-07 05:56:00 UTC

CapitolIt might be a Hail Mary pass to stop the inevitable, but 39 prominent D.C. Republicans signed on to a court brief yesterday seeking to place a hold on Washington, D.C.'s recently passed marriage equality law. The group of Republicans features some heavy hitters, from the House Minority Leader to the House Minority Whip, and their brief argues that civil rights should be put up for a vote by D.C. residents.

For a party that trash talks the use of lawsuits and trial attorneys, it's a bit of a shining moment of hypocrisy. But one that certainly fits the agenda of socially conservative forces who don't like to see the gays in relationships.

"As members of the District's ultimate legislative body, [we] are concerned about the extent of the District's delegated legislative authority, the preservation of Congress's constitutional authority, and the interpretation of home rule," the gang of 39 said. Mostly that's a bunch of legal mumbo jumbo taking the D.C. City Council and Mayor to task for voting on an issue they want voters to decide.

But as the D.C. Board of Elections and Ethics has said -- twice, now -- civil rights aren't supposed to be put up for a vote. Ever.

Who is a part of this homophobic club of 39 GOP members? The list is pasted below, and you'll see a who's who of U.S. House leadership, coupled with two conservative U.S. Senators. But despite the fact that these 39 jumped on to another anti-gay bandwagon, it could actually be seen as a victory that only 39 Republicans supported this court brief. Why?

Because Congress has 217 Republicans (218 if you count Joe Lieberman). With 39 Republican signatories, this brief only covers 18 percent of the entire Republican delegation in the U.S. Congress. That hardly seems like overwhelming support, even if some of the names signing on to this brief are Republican leaders.

And what a difference a decade makes. In the 1990s, when the Defense of Marriage Act was voted on, 427 members of Congress voted for it. Today, not even 40 members of Congress stood up to oppose gay marriage right in their own backyard. That's probably good news, despite the brief filed by these 39 Republicans.

Here's the roll call of the new homophobic elite in the 111th Congress.

U.S. Reps. Robert Aderholt (Ala.), Todd Akin (Mo.), Michele Bachmann (Minn.), J. Gresham Barrett (S.C.), Roscoe Bartlett (Md.), Marsha Blackburn (Tenn.), John Boehner (Ohio), John Boozman (Ark.), Jason Chaffetz (Utah), John Fleming (La.), J. Randy Forbes (Va.), Virginia Foxx (N.C.), Scott Garrett (N.J.), Phil Gingrey (Ga.), Louie Gohmert (Tex.), Jeb Hensarling (Tex.), Wally Herger (Calif.), Walter Jones (N.C.), Jim Jordan (Ohio), Steve King (Iowa), Jack Kingston (Ga.), John Kline (Minn.) Doug Lamborn (Colo.), Robert Latta (Ohio), Don Manzullo (Ill.), Michael McCaul (Tex.), Thaddeus McCotter (Mich.), Patrick McHenry (N.C.), Cathy McMorris Rodgers (Wash.), Jeff Miller (Fla.), Jerry Moran (Kan.), Randy Neugebauer (Tex.), Mike Pence (Ind.), Joe Pitts (Pa.), Mark Souder (Ind.) and Todd Tiahrt (Kan.). Plus U.S. Sens. James Inhofe (Okla.) and Roger Wicker (Miss.)

Photo: Seansie

Michael Jones is a Change.org Editor. He has worked in the field of human rights communications for a decade, most recently for Harvard Law School.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Prop 8 Trial? No Live TV Coverage For You!
NEXT STORY:
Bullied high schooler convinces MPAA to change ‘Bully’ rating to “PG-13”

COMMENTS (20)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.