Reverse Retouching: Removing Scary Signs of Thinness

by Sarah Menkedick · 2010-06-10 07:05:00 UTC
Topics:

You know, you might think that if the people employed in the fashion industry were disturbed by the unhealthily thin models coming in for photo shoots, if they found the models' jutting bones and emaciated faces disturbing, they might, say hire bigger models, or encourage models not to be quite so thin.

But no! No one should question the nothing-tastes-as-good-as-skinny-feels mantra espoused by that goddess of heroin chic, Kate Moss. Instead, fashion magazines engage in "reverse retouching" — using Photoshop to make a model look curvier, bigger, "healthier," when she is actually frighteningly skinny.

The most ironic example as of late is with Healthy magazine, which recently Photoshopped 15-20 kilograms (nearly forty pounds!) onto model Kamilla Wladyka, whom Healthy editor Jane Druker called "unwell."

As in, dangerously thin? As in, anorexic? Might not the solution be to send Wladyka home and tell her to get help, to notify her agency so they can seek aid for her? Nope — instead Druker tried to find clothes that wouldn't show Wladyka's bones and then digitally added the necessary pounds to make her suitable for the cover of a magazine called Healthy.

Meanwhile Robin Derrick, the creative director of Vogue, recently confessed, "I spent the first ten years of my career making girls look thinner — and the last ten making them look larger." A former editor at Cosmo came out in the Daily Mail as a repentant reverse Photoshopper, conveniently blaming her needs for digital retouching on models who live on coffee and vodka and choose abusive boyfriends, therefore messing up photo shoots left and right with their bruises and their ruined skin and hair.

No longer editing at the magazine, she now apparently laments giving readers an unrealistic idea of thinness as a sort of winner-take-all game in which you can be as excessively skinny as society demands and still be gorgeous and healthy, too.

It's disturbing enough that already thin models are Photoshopped to look even thinner, but reverse retouching is illustrative of just how deep our social, cultural and psychological obsession with thinness goes. Very few fashion editors or designers would dare take the essential step of setting healthier body image standards, and working with models who aren't devastatingly thin or on the brink of being so. They'd rather preserve the deeply instilled adoration of thinness and work around the fact that it's unattractive and deadly with a few magic strokes on the keyboard.

Photo credit: TheeErin

Sarah Menkedick is a freelance writer currently based in Oaxaca, Mexico. She has spent the last five years teaching, writing and traveling on five continents. She regularly writes about women's rights.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Teacher Fired for Having Premarital Sex
NEXT STORY:
LEGO Agrees to Meeting After 50,000 Denounce Selling Out Girls

COMMENTS (2)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.