School Did Discriminate Against Queer Student, But Prom Stays Cancelled

by Alex DiBranco · 2010-03-24 15:48:00 UTC

Constance McMillin won her case, but the victory feels a little hollow.

The Mississippi high school student was banned from bringing her girlfriend to the prom and wearing a tuxedo. When McMillin protested and the American Civil Liberties Union got involved, the school reacted by canceling prom for everybody. Yesterday, a judge ruled that her school had, indeed, violated her First Amendment constitutional rights. But Judge Glen Davidson won't be forcing the school to reinstate prom.

Why not? The judge feels that forcing the (homophobic) school administration to sponsor the dance once again would "confuse and confound the community on this issue," especially since two private alternative proms have already been organized: one organized by fellow students and parents, where it seems McMillin is not welcome, and an inclusive one by the Mississippi Safe Schools Coalition.

McMillin says she understands the rationale for not reinstating the school prom and the decision has been declared a victory for her. Well, I guess sort of. But what about the next time this happens? Already, McMillin's case felt a little like deja vu. In order to make sure another LGBTQ student doesn't suffer the way McMillin did, we need to pass the Student Non-Discrimination Act.

SNDA would bar schools from discriminating based on students' sexual orientation or gender identity, and provide real ways for students to make certain their rights are upheld. Please sign this petition to call on your representatives to stand behind SNDA.

Photo credit: adamr.stone

Alex DiBranco is a Change.org Editor who has worked for the Nation, Political Research Associates, and the Center for American Progress. She is now based in New York City.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Palestinian Women Victim to Increasing Violence and Discrimination
NEXT STORY:
LEGO Agrees to Meeting After 50,000 Denounce Selling Out Girls

COMMENTS (2)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.