Shelter Accused of Killing Animals People Want to Adopt

by Stephanie Feldstein · 2010-05-03 06:00:00 UTC

The Robeson County Animal Shelter was the only shelter in North Carolina to use "heart sticking," a controversial method of euthanasia where animals are injected directly in the heart. Less than two weeks ago, they finally agreed to stop the practice in favor of the more humane intravenous injection. (The fact that a bill has been proposed to outlaw the method in the state probably helped along the decision.)

That wasn't the end of the shelter's euthanasia scandals.

Last Thursday, the Gerber Animal Law Center of Raleigh filed suit against the shelter on behalf of Susan Barrett, who says the shelter euthanized a dog after she told them she planned to adopt. According to Health Director Bill Smith, the policy isn't to hold animals, but "an animal may be adopted to whoever is present." Barrett was in the parking lot when the dog she wanted was killed. 

Several other animal rescue groups signed onto the lawsuit, citing similar experiences of animals being euthanized shortly after they expressed interest. "The more we want a dog, the quicker the dog is put down."

Last year, the shelter euthanized more than 4,500 dogs and cats, about 88 percent of the animals they took in. Smith blames too many animals, limited community involvement, and not enough space or money. But those are pretty empty excuses considering that whenever the rescue community tries to get involved, the shelter kills more animals. And ever since tales of abuse have been circulating the internet, the involved community keeps expanding, with rescuers coming from all over the country to save animals from a near-certain death sentence.

Adoption seems to be the lowest priority for Robeson County. According to the lawsuit, the shelter also has a policy to leave as many as half the kennels empty for easier cleaning. Seems like the fastest way to cut their euthanasia rate would be to put the cages to use. On Friday, the shelter opened three hours later than their posted adoption hours, despite the dozen or so people waiting outside. A shelter employee said opening was delayed to allow for cleaning. They keep recycling the "cleaning" excuse as if their kennels are for show rather than saving lives. It shouldn't be too much to expect an animal shelter to actually shelter animals.

District Court Judge Jeffrey Moore issued a restraining order to prevent Robeson County from euthanizing any more animals that people have expressed an interest in adopting. Smith said he worries rescue groups will call and ask for adoptions to begin on all dogs, even if they won't follow through. As if not killing every animal that comes through the door is the worst thing that could happen. And did it ever occur to him that rescue groups don't spend their time pretending to rescue, that some people might actually want to save animals from his shelter?

Photo credit: jronaldlee

Stephanie Feldstein is a Change.org Editor who has been part of the animal welfare and rescue community for over a decade, and most recently worked for an environmental organization.
PREVIOUS STORY:
British Advertiser Thinks Kicking Cats is Hilarious
NEXT STORY:
Petitions Delivered Around the World for Release of Indonesian Circus Dolphins

COMMENTS (15)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.