Shopping for Green Gadgets with Jill Fehrenbacher

by Emily Gertz · 2009-02-19 08:50:00 UTC
Topics:

Jill Fehrenbacher

Who doesn't love a good gadget? I sure do -- but it's aggravating how few choices there are that meet the sweet spot where utility, great design, energy-efficiency and enviro-friendly materials overlap.

Jill Fehrenbacher -- founder of the green design site Inhabitat, and a fellow contributor to the book Worldchanging: A User's Guide for the 21st Century -- goes shopping with The New York Times today for some good green gadgets, and finds some that hit the sweet spot. Instead of inventing and then solving problems that we didn't have before ('How can I get my iPhone to make a fart noise?'), the devices she picked address a refreshingly average array of quandries that a climate-minded consumer might have ('Couldn't I recharge my cell phone with a little solar cell, instead of plugging it into the wall?' or 'How can I figure out how much energy my appliances using?').

Jill is the founder of the Greener Gadgets Conference, where designers, tech and electronics companies, and entrepreneurs gather to see how their cohorts are combining sustainability with consumer electronics. I'll be covering his year's confab right here, next Friday, Feb. 27.

In the meantime, if you too love a good green gadget, go check out the top entries in the Greener Gadgets/core 77 design competition, and vote for your favorites. The top 10 will be judged live at the conference next week

PREVIOUS STORY:
Follow the Money Update: Recovery.gov goes live, but so far falls short
NEXT STORY:
Stopping the Water Grab in Nevada

COMMENTS (1)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.