Should a Billionaire Be Your Next Senator?

by Brittany Shoot · 2010-05-03 07:35:00 UTC

The real estate billionaire Jeff Greene, known as the "meltdown mogul," has entered Florida's Senate race as a Democrat after Governor Charlie Crist switched to run as an independent this week. More diversity for any elected seat is a great idea, you may be thinking. But perhaps you're assuming that diversity means something different than what Jeff Greene has in mind.

In 2008, Forbes profiled the newly-rich Greene, interviewing him on his yacht while it was docked in the Hamptons and explaining how the real estate investor frequently bounces between his five homes. The story, with the stomach-turning title of "The Reluctant Billionaire," explores how Greene became mega rich by betting on the failing housing market — that is, betting that mortgages would default and the housing bubble would burst. Several opportunistic moves later, investing his own reserves of several million against the common knowledge of Wall Street, Greene made a reported $800 million on the housing crash.

Here's the thing: it seems disingenuous at best when Greene claims that because he isn't a career politician, he's the man for the job. I get that he doesn't have experience as a politician — though he has conveniently omitted that he ran for Congress as a Republican in the 1980s — but this is also someone who actively profited from everyone else's misery over the past few years. The guy doesn't even try to hide it! It's highlighted as his biggest accomplishment! Anticipating backlash, he already released a statement that says there's a "big difference between what I did and what Wall Street did." Um, okay. He's also promising to refuse campaign contributions, but do we really care when he's one of the candidates who can actually afford to do so?

This leads me to ask: would you rather have a super wealthy guy pretending to be an everyman or a seasoned politician who at least knows the ropes? I'm in favor of an alternative to both, though one has yet to emerge. We've already got enough rich guys in Washington making decisions on behalf of their impoverished constituents, and frankly, that combination doesn't seem to be getting us anywhere. There are hundreds of thousands of people in our country right now living without even the essentials. Where's the news coverage for them? Where is their representation? And where is the outrage?

Photo credit: Joe Shlabotnik

Brittany Shoot is a writer and editor whose work has been published by Bitch, In These Times, the New York Times, RH Reality Check, truthout and ZNet.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Homeless and OK With It
NEXT STORY:
Is the NCAA Putting Student Athletes at Risk?

COMMENTS (11)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.