Stimulus Funds to Rehire Teachers Banked for the Future Instead

by Brittany Shoot · 2010-08-19 13:25:00 UTC

It's a horrible time to be a teacher. Many are being laid-off or battling for fair salaries. A number are fighting for their colleagues — janitors, cafeteria workers, counselors, bus drivers, and other school personnel who are also being laid off in record numbers. Some teachers are even resorting to asking their students to pitch in for classroom supplies.

But the New York Times reports that even when school districts are given funds to rehire laid-off teachers, they aren't necessarily doing it. Terrified that things could still get worse, they're hoarding the money for anticipated future budget shortfalls instead of re-employing the teachers now, whenstudents need them and when they need the jobs.

The trouble, of course, is that this is perfectly within the prescribed limits of the original bill signed by President Obama. The stimulus package stipulates that states must allocate their portion of the $10 billion federal money to school districts this year, but that the individual districts have until September 2012 to spend the money. This allows them to sit on their reserves in case of even greater emergency. The question is, are they hurting more people in the process?

Many districts fear rehiring too many teachers when funding for next year hasn't been guaranteed. But the Times reports that teachers' unions are pushing for rehires now, as temporary relief for everyone. Out-of-work teachers need their jobs back, and children need smaller classes and more individual attention. Learning can't stop just because there's no way to pay for it.

This is obviously contentious. Do we want to save jobs now, or do we want to further education later? Do we want to employ laid-off teachers and put them to work for our children's future, or do we want to be sure there will be enough for school districts to hire back a full teaching staff later on? Right now, many districts are being forced to make that choice, impossible as it is.

Photo credit: Chicago 2016 Photos

Brittany Shoot is a writer and editor whose work has been published by Bitch, In These Times, the New York Times, RH Reality Check, truthout and ZNet.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Homeless Killings at Highest Level in a Decade
NEXT STORY:
Is the NCAA Putting Student Athletes at Risk?

COMMENTS (0)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.