Stories from the Ranch

by Mark Horvath · 2009-12-01 09:10:00 UTC
Topics:

Last week, I covered the story of Daniel de Vaul. For eight years, he has operated a residential sobriety program on his 72-acre ranch in San Luis Obispo. While many formerly homeless addicts credit de Vaul with their sobriety, he was arrested last week for building code violations that violated the terms of his probation.

Since this story broke, many people have been divided on this issue. Should the rancher be lauded for providing housing to the homeless? Or punished because of the awful conditions of his property?

Mark Horvath of Invisible People traveled out to Sunny Acres Ranch this weekend to get the real stories behind the headlines. His goal? To move past the media spin and hear the voice that matters most: the formerly homeless people living the ranch. Here are there stories.  -Shannon

Read Mark's perspective on this story, including his visit to the ranch, right here.

Interview with Dan De Vaul. Jennifer, a mental health case worker for Santa Barbara Count, joined us for the interview.

Photos from the ranch. (If the pictures look dark, it's because the flash would not work inside the barns.)

Randy has lived in a 10x12 ‘garden shed' for four months now. He credits Sunny Acres for his sobriety.

Jimmy is a Vietnam veteran who has lived on the ranch off-and-on for seven years. He has been clean and sober for two years.

Image: invisiblepeople.tv

Mark Horvath is an activist for the homeless. He vlogs at invisiblepeople.tv and blogs at hardlynormal.com. He was formerly homeless in Hollywood.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Are Jobs the New Homeless Prevention Strategy?
NEXT STORY:
Sallie Mae Blinks!

COMMENTS (1)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.