Study Shows Link Between Farming and Breast Cancer

by Sarah Parsons · 2010-05-14 15:00:00 UTC

Growing up on a farm sounds so idyllic. Shearing the sheep, picking fresh tomatoes, spraying the fields with noxious chemicals. OK, so maybe not that last one. But unfortunately, using pesticides is an all-too-common practice, even on some family farms.

A new study joins a growing body of evidence showing just how profound of an effect pesticide use can have on human health. Researchers Jim Brophy and Margaret Keith from the University of Windsor found that women with a history of farming had a greater risk of developing breast cancer. The scientists began the research project with the intent of finding groups with heightened cancer risks because of their jobs, figuring the most common group would be male industrial workers. "To our surprise, the biggest group we had were women with breast cancer who had a history of farming," Brophy told a reporter at QMI Agency.

Researchers believe chemicals and pesticides are to blame for the increased breast cancer rates in female farm workers. Some pesticides and farm chemicals are carcinogens, while others mimic estrogen. Chemicals that mimic estrogen are linked to cancer and other diseases, particularly if exposure occurred during childhood. Many of the women in the study group said they helped out on family farms at young ages.

A lot of support for organic, chemical-free farming comes from environmentalists, who tout the practice's benefits for land, water, and wildlife. And they're right--cutting back on chemical-use greatly benefits the flora and fauna. But this study is yet another example of how eliminating toxins can improve human health, especially in children. If exposure to estrogen-mimicking chemicals during childhood can cause breast cancer later in life, clearly we're dealing with some potent toxins. Those kinds of chemicals shouldn't be near our cucumbers, much less near our children.

Photo credit: Schmidt via Wikimedia Commons

Sarah Parsons is Change.org's Sustainable Food Editor. Her work has appeared in Popular Science, OnEarth, Audubon and Plenty.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Farming ... with Horses ... in New Jersey?
NEXT STORY:
Join the Social Media Day of Action to Rid Girl Scout Cookies of Forest-Destroying Palm Oil

COMMENTS (0)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.