Sunday Links. Including, Of Course, Development Debates

by Michael Bear · 2009-07-19 13:22:00 UTC

A week of development debates, large and small, most of which seem to feature agent provocateur William Easterly.  (A Collier-Easterly rumble in the academic jungle! An Easterly-Blattman thriller in, well, cyberspace!)

Without further ado:

- The Boston Review has a fascinating series on Development in Dangerous Places - Paul Collier starts the debate by arguing without security, the bottom billion will remain in a Hobbsian state of nature; he then suggests that the international community should provide such security.

To that end, he lays out a range of policy options, from increased funding for UN peacekeeping operations to a promise by wealthier nations to protect democratically-elected governments in the developing world from coups.

A wide range of development thinkers (for lack of a better term) then respond to Collier's idea. The participants inlcude Stephen Krasner, William Easterly, Larry Diamond, Edward Miguel, Mike McGovern, and Nancy Birdsall - the responses range from respectful (Birdsall) to derisive (Easterly), with the rest scattered somewhere in-between.

- Continuing with the Bill Easterly theme - Easterly and Chris Blattman debate the use of randomized control trials in development.

- Finally, Easterly and John Boonstra at UN Dispatch recently wrangled over whether the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) are a failure.  Daniel Esser - an old friend from Afghanistan days who started a fascinating blog on the politics of international development - recently waded into the debate, looking at the MDGs as fiction.

[Photo of William Easterly by www.clintrogersonline.com]

PREVIOUS STORY:
Weekly Highlights, July 12 –18
NEXT STORY:
A letter from Bettina Siegel, "Pink Slime" petition creator

COMMENTS (0)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.