Tell Mayor Bloomberg to Stop Fighting Living Wage Legislation

by Lauren Kelley · 2010-05-30 06:00:00 UTC

Readers, I need your assistance. Please help me understand why a proposed bill that would guarantee a living wage for New Yorkers working on city-subsidized projects is controversial. Because I really don't understand.

The Fair Wages for New Yorkers Act would ensure that any developer receiving city funds for a project has to pay its workers at least $10 an hour, or about $3 an hour more than minimum wage. Ten dollars an hour is not a lot of money. In fact, for someone working forty hours a week, it comes out to something like $20,000 a year. For a single-income family of four, that would be below the federal poverty line. Don't forget that we're talking about New York City here, which is the single most expensive place to live in the country. Who could possibly be in favor of paying New York workers — those working on projects funded with taxpayers' money, no less — so little?

I'll tell you who: our mayor. Yes, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg is the driving force behind the opposition to the Fair Wages for New Yorkers Act. His argument is that the bill would hinder development, because developers won't be willing to pay the extra labor costs so they'll pass on city contracts. But guess what, Mayor Bloomberg? Ensuring prosperity for New Yorkers is your job.

It's incredibly hypocritical, if you think about it, for the city to fund homeless prevention programs, but not be willing to ensure that workers earn enough to pay their rent. Is Bloomberg aware of how people become homeless? Is he also aware that New Yorkers, as a whole, are struggling amidst 10 percent unemployment right now? Seeing as how he's not only the richest man in New York, but one of the richest men in the world, it's easy to see how he'd be a little out of touch with the needs of the poor. But that doesn't make it right.

For the record, at least 120 other cities around the country have laws requiring wage standards for city-funded projects, and none of them are worse off for it. New York City even reached a similar agreement last year for a development project in Coney Island. It sounds like Mayor Bloomberg may have forgotten about that. Let's remind him.

Photo credit: Ralph Alswang for the Center for American Progress

Lauren Kelley is an associate editor at AlterNet and a freelance writer. She has volunteered for Planned Parenthood of North Texas, Amnesty International, 826NYC and other groups.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Poor Kids More Likely to Drown
NEXT STORY:
Is the NCAA Putting Student Athletes at Risk?

COMMENTS (6)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.