The Anointment of Carrie Prejean as the Right's anti-LGBT Mouthpiece

by Michael Jones · 2009-07-28 13:01:00 UTC

Carrie PrejeanCarrie Prejean, the now disgraced former Miss USA contestant from California who believes that opposite marriage is far superior to same-sex marriage, should have been a fifteen minute blip on the fame radar.  Instead, the GOP is slowly albeit suredly working toward making her the Ann Coulter of this decade.

First, as we mentioned last week, they've hired Prejean to serve as a recruiter for the GOP, catering to young people in Florida with her message of "No gay marriage, no marriage equality, no gay people, ick."  This week, Prejean gets a cover story on the infamous conservative publication National Review, written by none-other-than Maggie Gallagher, the head of the National Organization for Marriage and one of the worst haircuts most virulently anti-LGBT people in the country.

The gist of Gallagher's glowing profile? The Carrie Prejean is to blame for renewed energy among the anti-LGBT crowd.  Of course, despite her trumpeting Prejean's ability to deflect progress on marriage equality, four states have already legalized same-sex marriage this year (the year of Carrie Prejean, if you will).  But that point not withstanding, Gallagher adds that Carrie Prejean is a martyr for cultural conservatives hell-bent against gay rights: she gave up her Miss USA crown in order to speak social conservative truths.

The problem with all of that?  The problem with all of this, of course, is that Carrie Prejean is no more substantive in talking about political issues than Britney Spears is in talking about the Iraq War.  The National Review, founded by William F. Buckley, is now putting Carrie Prejean on its cover pages instead of featuring substantive debates about the leading issues of today.

We're in the midst of the most important debate over health care in our country's history, yet the National Review features Carrie Prejean.

We're fighting two wars, while the world watches to see what geopolitical change will come to places like Iran, yet the National Review features Carrie Prejean.

We're six months off of the worst financial crisis in a generation or two, yet the National Review features Carrie Prejean.

For goodness sake, it's no wonder that the Democrats have majorities in both branches of Congress and the White House.  Responding to the leading issues of the day with a glamourshot of a former beauty pageant contestant says to this blogger that intellectualism on the conservative side is not only at an all-time low, it's practically extinct.

Carrie Prejean may have a multi-million dollar book deal, and she may be enjoying herself by singing kitschy songs at racing tracks.  But the GOP should really reconsider whether they want her to be the new face of their movement.  Because Carrie Prejean certainly doesn't say "big tent" to me.

Michael Jones is a Change.org Editor. He has worked in the field of human rights communications for a decade, most recently for Harvard Law School.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Grilling up Homophobia and Racial Discrimination at Golden Corral?
NEXT STORY:
Bullied high schooler convinces MPAA to change ‘Bully’ rating to “PG-13”

COMMENTS (7)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.