The Case For Data-Driven Justice

by Matt Kelley · 2010-08-16 10:51:00 UTC

Crime-tracking and mapping software like CompStat has changed policing. So when will the data revolution reach our courts?

In an excellent New York Times op-ed, Amy Bach writes that while we use sophisticated statistics to assess schools and hospitals and set overall public policy, our courts are still stuck in the Stone Age. They operate as the legal equivalents of obsolete, wood-paneled vacuums — missing countless chances to learn from the successes and failures of other courts. And it doesn't need to be this way.

To change the system, Bach (author of Ordinary Injustice: How America Holds Court) proposes creating a "justice index" to measure local courts on issues like cost, recidivism, crime reduction and collateral consequences, including whether people lose their jobs or homes after contact with the criminal justice system.

It's a brilliant idea, and I hope courts and policy-makers are listening. Courts are meant to protect the public, and that means they should be helping to reduce crime and improving peoples' lives. Instead, we've come to expect that our court system exists as a dense bureaucracy riddled with inequalities and endless delays.

The good news is that isolated courts exist there are that are experimenting and improving results through data analysis. Hawaii Judge Steven Alm, for example, looked at the data of cases before him and found that short, certain sentences actually prevent crime and make probation more effective. Likewise, UCLA Professor Mark Kleiman expands on this theme, offering more data in his book When Brute Force Fails. Bach makes the case for a nationwide data project — starting with the country's 25 biggest counties — so that we can concretely establish what types of probation are more effective and learn from counties that have actually succeeded in reducing cost and crime.

To be sure, at this point, the justice system is so thoroughly broken that any kind of substantive data analysis is seriously threatening. However, there's some real momentum behind the issue — particularly in light of the fact that the U.S. House has voted to support the National Criminal Justice Commission (which is now waiting for Senate approval). Data-driven justice is a great goal, but it the meantime, it needs people like you and me behind it.

Photo Credit: lastquest

Matt Kelley is the Online Communications Manager at the Innocence Project and a graduate of the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University. Follow him on Twitter @mattjkelley.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Tell California: Don't Borrow From Peter to Execute Paul
NEXT STORY:
Make the Call! Stop the Torture of Special Needs Children in Massachusetts

COMMENTS (0)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.