The "Exit Strategy" for D.C.'s Homeless

You may remember the story: First Lady Michelle Obama spends a day serving food in a soup kitchen in the capital. An excited guest snaps a picture of her with a camera phone. The right wing media goes nuts asking, "How can a homeless guy have a cell phone?!," not realizing that cell phones are an affordable lifeline for many homeless individuals. A Department of Labor employee includes a photo of the man taking a photo in a disparaging email. Homeless advocates use that gaffe to forge a relationship with the Department. What do we want? Jobs! When do we want them? Now!

That saga that began with a homeless man photographing Michelle Obama and led to homeless advocates working with the Labor Department and D.C.'s Department of Human Services to create a job-training program for the homeless continues.

In May, the advocacy organization STREATS and DHS filed paperwork with DOL in order to get funding for the "Exit Strategy," a program that would train higher-functioning homeless people to do jobs that pay a living wage so that they wouldn't need to depend on the government for anything — not food stamps, help with rent or any other federal assistance. However, the paperwork was filed too close to the end of DOL's budgetary funding cycle, which means that now we must wait until the next fiscal year to be funded by DOL.

STREATS recently met with Human Services director Clarence Carter to discuss the development of this program and other funding options including the distinct possibility of funding from DHS. However, one of the basic rules of funding is that a program must be designed according to the preferences of those providing the funding. On the one hand, if the Exit Strategy were funded by the federal government, STREATS would have to do what is known in the homeless advocacy community as "creaming" — helping those who are easiest to help, who have the fewest issues and who are most likely to succeed (i.e. leave homelessness). This would mean that the program wouldn't help anyone with mental illness, physical impairments or chemical dependency. On the other hand, if the Exit Strategy were funded by DHS, we would have to do some "silting" — helping those who are hardest to help.

Under the leadership of Director Carter DHS has done much silting. They've had a policy of focusing on the "most vulnerable" homeless so as to get them in housing and connect them to much-needed services — but not jobs. This ambitious goal is admirable and serves an important purpose. Nonetheless, D.C.'s homeless shelters are chock full of able-bodied, able-minded people who just need a little help getting back on their feet. These people complain to me often about being ignored by the system. When asked about the prospects of DHS shifting its focus from the most vulnerable to the least vulnerable homeless, Carter was adamant about continuing to deliver the same level of service to those who are most vulnerable.

Carter said that he would definitely not fund a program that only accepted homeless people who had no other issues, but might fund a program that accepts any homeless person who wants to work. That said, we are now making plans to incorporate the Exit Strategy at D.C.'s Emery "Work" Shelter where the primary requirement for entry is that a person is working a steady job. As it turns out, many residents have been at Emery for a considerable amount of time; because, their jobs don't pay a living wage and often pay minimum wage, thus making it impossible for them to exit homelessness. If (and when) all goes well, the Exit Strategy will retrain some residents to do higher-paying jobs and help others to find higher-paying jobs in their present field of work.

In mid-August, some members of STREATS met with Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton, Washington, D.C.'s congresswoman, to gain her support for the program. It was a sure sell insomuch as Norton heads the Commission on Black Men and Boys — a program which deals with the challenges faced by this particular group. She had just led a panel discussion at the Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial Library which addressed the challenges being faced by black men as they seek employment in today's job market. During our 15-minute meeting, she agreed that there is much overlap in what her commission and STREATS are doing in that a disproportionate number of homeless people are black men. She expressed her support for our effort and has offered to send a letter of support to people in D.C. government and the U.S. Department of Labor.

So, the Exit Strategy has gained the support of the U.S. Department of Labor, the D.C. Department of Human Services, Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton and, most importantly, the homeless community. However, that won't prevent it from falling prey to the ravages of the present economy. With so many people being laid off, we're left to wonder who, if anyone, is hiring these days. That's not to speak of the fact that an employer promising to hire someone who is in job-training is almost unheard of in Washington, D.C. Nonetheless, as it stands, the Exit Strategy — a program being developed for the most part by homeless and formerly homeless people — is a few months and one funding cycle away from becoming a reality.

Photo credit: Smath.

Eric Sheptock is a homeless advocate for the homeless who lives in Washington, D.C.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Big Bad News for Small Government and Small Kids
NEXT STORY:
Is the NCAA Putting Student Athletes at Risk?

COMMENTS (4)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.