THE most DANGEROUS woman in the WORLD....?
Wow. When political targeting goes wrong, it goes really, really wrong. Just received this hilarious, poorly designed email from some politician named John Dennis who is trying to challenge Speaker Nancy Pelosi in my home district in California.
Personally, the underlined statements are the best. If you read them in a Dr. Evil voice, you can almost make the fear mongering from the GOP funny:
I'm the Republican candidate challenging the most dangerous woman in the United States - Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi.
As Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi represents the greatest threat to restoring our nation's financial health and to continuing the great American experiment in liberty.
It's not only our nation's economic future that is at risk in the current debate over health care, it is the future of individual freedom.
Nancy Pelosi has called those of us who protest her scheme, "un-American." What is "un-American" is to remain silent while she and her left-wing allies trample the Constitution in an attempt to increase the size and power of the Federal bureaucracy.
If you are a concerned American like me, you realize how important it is to have someone speak out against the Pelosi Agenda of expanding government control over every aspect of our personal lives.
We are going to take the fight right to Pelosi - That's why I need your help.
Jennifer, it's critical to have the support of people like you who care deeply about America and its future.
Sure, I care about America, buddy, but sheesh - could you have picked a WORSE person to receive this email? I only happened to work for Nancy Pelosi during college.
Good grief - is this really what conservatives are using to rally their base? Now that's scary.
Still scratching my head about how I could have possibly ended up on this email list. Maybe it was all that covert conservative organizing I did while growing up in the Haight-Ashbury?
<insert sarcasm here>
I also love how this guy talks about what is really at risk in the health care debate: the future of individual freedom.
(underline, underline, underline)
Hmm - so I guess that means he is pro-choice, right? Doubtful.







COMMENTS (6)