The Shell Game

by Cameron Scott · 2010-02-05 15:03:00 UTC

You can take the boy out of the country, but you can't take the country out of the boy: The old saying appears to hold true for oil companies' expansion into renewable fuels.

Earlier this week, Royal Dutch Shell announced a $12 billion joint venture with the Brazilian company Cosan to make ethanol from sugarcane. Cosan, however, was recently blacklisted by the Brazilian government for relying on forced labor.

Cosan subsequently secured a temporary injunction allowing it to continue to do business, but the massive expansion Shell is funding will almost certainly force the company to prioritize growth over improving its labor practices. (Change.org's Human Trafficking blog has more details on the forced labor allegations.)

Also at stake are environmental practices.

Sugarcane is, on the whole, an efficient source of ethanol, requiring far less fossil-fuel energy per unit of energy produced than corn. But the rapid expansion of Brazil's crop for ethanol production has infringed on environmentally senstive lands and pushed other agricultural ventures into the Amazon rainforest.

Land use often determines whether plant-based fuels offer improvements over gasoline. And there's no question that Shell executives know that.

If Shell is serious about hedging its environmental bets by producing greener fuels in addition to oil, it should create a clear, enforceable policy on where and how its sugarcane is grown.

Photo credit: Mette Nielsen

Cameron Scott writes The Thin Green Line blog at SFGate (San Francisco Chronicle).
PREVIOUS STORY:
National Climate Plans Suggest a Long, Hot Slog Ahead
NEXT STORY:
Stopping the Water Grab in Nevada

COMMENTS (0)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.