The Unconstitutionality of DOMA
Check out this late-breaking news from change.org's Women's Rights blogger, Jen Nedeau. To paraphrase Jen, here's hoping the rest of the country (starting with California on March 5!) follows suit:
9th Circuit Undermines DOMA, Asks for Federal Benefits of Same Sex Spouses
Published February 04, 2009 @ 08:41PM PST
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals just ordered Federal Health Insurance Benefits for same sex married couples. The case involves Deputy Federal Public Defender Brad Levenson, who married Tony Sears last July 12, and 9th Circuit staff lawyer Karen Golinski, who married Amy Cunninghis last year.
The LA Observer reported today that the ruling by Judge Stephen Reinhardt says the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutionally denies benefits to gay federal employees' spouses. The ruling filed under the Order, Employment Dispute Resolution Plan for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals says:
"The denial of federal benefits to same-sex spouses cannot be justified simply by a distaste for or disapproval of same-sex marriage or a desire to deprive same-sex spouses benefits available to other spouses in order to discourage exercising a legal right afforded them by the state," Reinhardt wrote in his Feb. 2 order....
Both orders are internal employee grievance decisions. Both found in favor of the gay employees, directing court administrators to give health insurance benefits to their spouses. The orders also represent direct challenges to DOMA, the 1996 act that forbids the federal government from treating same-sex relationships as marriages for any purpose.
A lawyer for the staff attorney said this is believed to be the first time federal employees will get benefits covering a same-sex spouse.
[skip]
Reinhardt and Kozinski wrote the orders in their roles as hearing officers for some circuit employee disputes."
Well done, Ninth Circuit. Thank you for setting the trend in equality once more - now if only the rest of the country could follow suit!







COMMENTS (4)