The Voices Beyond The Conference

by Nathaniel Whittemore · 2009-09-01 17:21:00 UTC

The elephant in the room of any nonprofit conference is about who isn't there, which more often than not is the people who are actually experiencing the impact of the problems we're all trying to solve. While social entrepreneurship events like SoCap09 and the Skoll World Forum are increasingly focused on enabling international participation, there remains a question of whether we're leaving a fundamentally vital group out of the conversation.

I discussed this topic with Erik Hersman, founder of Ushahidi this morning. Erik, who blogs at Whiteafrican.com, was born to missionary parents in Kenya and has spent his life bouncing between Africa and America. He basically advocated that there needed to be human bridges to carry voices from there to here.

Erik Hersman - SoCap09 from Nathaniel Whittemore on Vimeo.

This is an incredible difficult question. At the Global Engagement Summit I started at Northwestern University, we've allocated about 25% of our budget for the past five years to flying in international participants who wouldn't otherwise be able to participate. That said, our economics were those of an event that is largely paid for by a private university. Most nonprofit conferences have a difficult time just breaking even as it is.

There seems to be an opportunity with social media, livestreaming, and affiliated events (like the new TEDx) series to better tackle this issue head on. Have people seen good examples of getting a more diverse representation at events?

Nathaniel Whittemore is the founder of Assetmap. Previously he was the founding director of the Northwestern University Center for Global Engagement.
PREVIOUS STORY:
The Government and Social Entrepreneurship: What Works?
NEXT STORY:
Facing Forward: The End of the Social Entrepreneurship Blog on Change.org

COMMENTS (3)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.