Throwing Stones

by Cameron Scott · 2010-01-12 18:11:00 UTC
Topics:

Here we are in one of the wealthiest countries the world has ever known, and we have virtually no regulation of chemicals and people still get sick -- sometimes very sick -- from food and drugs that have been marketed as safe.

The Food and Drug Administration is pathetic, right? Well, perhaps, but the FDA isn't responsible for all the things in the paragraph above.

Chemicals are divided between it and the EPA -- ostensibly depending on their use, but in practice, sometimes defying logic.

And meat, which is certainly food -- however much some vegetarians wish it weren't -- is overseen by the USDA, which might well be the most industry-entangled government agency the world has ever known.

The FDA, at least, is attempting to give itself a friendlier public face, sending its special adviser for food safety, Michael Taylor, off to -- it had to come to this eventually -- blog for the Atlantic.

Taylor used to be the Under Secretary of Food Safety at the USDA. Is it strange, then, that his introductory post talks up safety in produce and peanut butter, but never mentions meat? Tom Laskawy thinks so.

I'm not convinced: It's not politically savvy to cast cyber stones at other agencies -- even when they really, really deserve it.

But Laskawy makes another, more damning point: Taylor beats the drum for better communication and coordination in food safety, but fails to mention increasing inspections, which were gutted under the Bush administration; requiring more evidence of product safety from pharmaceuticals and food processors; or hitting companies with more than a slap on the wrist when they repeatedly violate regulations.

Photo credit: Mackarus

Cameron Scott writes The Thin Green Line blog at SFGate (San Francisco Chronicle).
PREVIOUS STORY:
Fighting Over Food
NEXT STORY:
Join the Social Media Day of Action to Rid Girl Scout Cookies of Forest-Destroying Palm Oil

COMMENTS (1)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.