Tuesday Links. Including, of Course, NGOs and the ICC

by Michael Bear · 2009-07-28 07:37:00 UTC

Travellering, so keeping this relatively short:

- A fascinating two-part series on the blog Making Sense of Darfur on Humanitarian aid and the International Criminal Court: Grounds for Divorce.  Part two is here.  The final paragraph is particularly thought-provoking:

"Nevertheless, NGOs’ infatuation with punitive justice and, more generally, the use of force – like military intervention in the name of the “responsibility to protect” – is puzzling. Foreign military intervention and the punishment of criminals are not necessarily the best ways to contain the violence of war. While politics of aid and mediation have many limitations, they also have their virtues. The job of humanitarian organizations, to my mind, is to foster the latter, and not to advocate for a global moral order based on judicial punishment and just war."

- Adam Hochschild writing in the New York Review of Books about Rape of the Congo.  It's a brutal, searing read.  For more information about rape as a weapon of war in Congo, see this resource page.

- And, finally, in the "Really? That's a surprise" category -  the Khaleej Times cites a UN report that Saudi Arabia is the largest donor to humanitarian appeals, as measured by a percentage of GDP.

For more information on humanitarian and development funding - including the largest donors in overall and absolute terms, which countries receive the most aid, and what kind of activities donors prefer to fund - see here.

[Photo from the site Canada and the International Criminal Court at www.international.gc.ca.]

PREVIOUS STORY:
Daily Darfur: 36 Child Soldiers Demobilized, More to Come
NEXT STORY:
A letter from Bettina Siegel, "Pink Slime" petition creator

COMMENTS (0)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.