US Creates Institute to Help Feed the World, But Growing Biofuels Will Negate Progress

by Mike Smith · 2009-10-14 16:14:00 UTC

A new agricultural research institute launched by the Obama administration and the National Institute of Food doesn't sound like good news for global health, right? More research into how to feed ourselves even more food whilst so many miss out. Not so fast: Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack explains that the institute will be international and focus on "global food security and hunger, climate change, sustainable energy, childhood obesity and food safety."

Vilsack is hoping the research will allow U.S. agriculture to continue to compete internationally, whilst simultaneously working to end hunger. The hope is that this new institution will link industry, academia and non-profits with government efforts. It's a much needed push, with so many wondering how we will be able to feed the few billion more people that arrive on this planet by 2050.

But they've got it all backwards if they continue to invest in biofuels, as they plan to do as part of the new institute's work: "Obama has set ambitious but achievable goals for securing America's energy future from new domestic sources, including 60 billion gallons a year from biofuels by 2030."

This is a really bad idea if fighting hunger is a priority. Biofuels either require new arable be created (cutting down rainforest etc) or arable land used for food production is re-purposed in land for biofuels. Doing this in countries that suffer food insecurity and hunger (as often happens) is utter madness. And worse than that, the research indicates that biofuels actually produce more emissions than oil. The benefit of biofuels of course being that they cut our dependence on foreign oil.

So instead of polluting the world with C02, we're going to starve it. Great!

Photo credit: Sam Beebe / Ecotrust

PREVIOUS STORY:
Darfuri Activists Send Letter to Obama
NEXT STORY:
Campaign about Apple Factories in China Gains Wide and Diverse Support

COMMENTS (0)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.