Vote for the Best Design to Improve Life

by Nathaniel Whittemore · 2009-08-22 12:51:00 UTC

In many ways, I think the field of design might be the related field that social entrepreneurs most need to work to understand. With the new INDEX: Design to Improve Life, we all have a chance to dig into the field a little deeper and have a hand in awarding the most relevant design around.

One of my favorite examples of why design matters comes from frog designer Robert Fabricant. I wrote a post a few months back called "Using Dick Cheney to Save the World." The inspiration was a suggestion by Fabricant that an energy monitor boldly featuring Cheney's face would do a lot more to inspire behavior change than a standard monitor with buttons and numbers. His thought was to have an evil looking Cheney slowly smile more and more sinisterly as your energy usage went up. Imagine, he said, coming home to a horrible set of twinkling Cheneys.

This may seem cute, but I think that this sort of creativity has profound impact. Many of our problems are caused on a fundamental level by behaviors. Shifting behaviors is a complex business and tends to require a creative approach.

In my experience, designers tend to share with social entrepreneurs a fundamental believe that the world can be better and that better understanding how people interact with one another and their environment tends to hold the secret to improvement.

This spirit is on display in droves in the Index: Design to Improve Life contest. Voting began August 20th and users around the world with select a People's Choice winner. The nominees include incredible projects like the frog + Pop!Tech collaboration Project M. To see all the candidates and vote, visit: www.designtoimprovelife.dk

(Hat-tip on this post goes to Tim Leberecht, who wrote about INDEX on his iPlot blog)

Nathaniel Whittemore is the founder of Assetmap. Previously he was the founding director of the Northwestern University Center for Global Engagement.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Ashoka U Adds Five New Schools To Changemaker Campus Program
NEXT STORY:
Facing Forward: The End of the Social Entrepreneurship Blog on Change.org

COMMENTS (2)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.