Walmart Appeals Largest Discrimination Suit Ever to Supreme Court

by Chris Cassidy · 2010-08-26 06:00:00 UTC

No court has decided whether Walmart discriminated against over one million female employees from 1998 onward, but four times federal courts have ruled the that such a suit may proceed as a legitimate class action. Preferring to handle each allegation one-by-one, in an endless torrent of legal maneuvering, Walmart appealed certification of the class action decision to the Supreme Court this week.

The suit was filed in 2001 by six women who had worked at Walmart and were armed with a study showing that only 1/3 of the corporation's managers were female, but women composed 2/3 of the company's overall workforce.

In a statement released by the mega-retailer this week, Walmart claimed that its is "an excellent place for women to work and has been recognized as a leader in fostering the advancement and success of women in the workplace." Walmart argues that the class action cannot move forward because the allegations of gender discrimination vary too much among over one million women who work or worked at Walmart.

"Only the size of the case is unusual, and that is a product of Wal-Mart's size and the breadth of the discrimination we documented," argues Brad Selignman, lead attorney for the plaintiffs. There is no 'too big to be liable' exception in civil rights laws."

Whether a class action can be too big is now a question before a historically conservative Supreme Court. Led by Chief Justice John Roberts, and anchored by the Reagan-appointed swing-voter Justice Anthony Kennedy, the Court has recently displayed a pro-business pattern in its rulings. Since President George W. Bush's nominees Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito took their seats on the Court in 2003, 71% of narrowly divided cases have been decided in line with the Chamber of Commerce's position.

If the Court continues this pattern in Dukes v. Walmart, it would spell the end of the largest class action suit in American history. The Court first must decide to take the case. Considering the right-wing majority's penchant for siding with corporations, though, the best possible thing for women who worked at Walmart would be if the Court passes on the appeal, permitting the already-certified class action to move forward.

To take the case, though, only four of nine justices have to be interested. The justices return to the Court from a summer recess in October, though a decision in the Walmart suit may not wait.

It's not too late to tell Walmart what you think about its history of gender discrimination and legal battle against female employees. Tell Walmart that this is unacceptable.

Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons

Chris Cassidy writes on law, judicial nominations and the Constitution as they pertain to criminal justice reform and women's rights.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Kelly and Antoine Dodson and the Bed Intruder Song
NEXT STORY:
Fox News' Trotta Still Doesn't Get It: I Want Her Rape Apologism Off the Air

COMMENTS (1)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.