"We Shouldn't Fear Government Involvement in Our Health Care System"

by Timothy Foley · 2009-07-12 16:22:00 UTC

This is my second post on Wendell Potter’s interview on Bill Moyers Journal.  You can read the first part, or you can go straight to PBS.org to watch the whole program online.

Wendell Potter was a top-ranked executive at Cigna when the insurance industry began to bat down the outrage produced by Michael Moore’s Sicko.  That playbook of how they pressured Congress to take no action whatsoever in the face of Moore’s documentary should be very familiar to those watching the political dance going on in Washington.  Focus on the minority of “disaster” stories from those in England in Canada, even if those stories don’t represent the average experience.  Use your lobbying power to influence Democrats, especially centrist Democrats.  Threaten political reprisal.  Mock those who are advocating reform as being out-of-touch – a neat trick coming from executives who, as Potter mentions in the previous clip, flew in corporate jets and ate lunch with gold-plated silverware.

All of this was to obfuscate the central truth of Moore’s message – a truth that threatened the industry’s profits.  As defined by Potter, that truth is “That we shouldn't fear government involvement in our health care system. That there is an appropriate role for government, and it's been proven in the countries that were in that movie.”


It’s a shame that the clip cuts off where it does, as Potter goes on to make an eloquent case that if we don’t reform health care, it will change all the same – just in a direction that none of us want:

You know, we have more people who are uninsured in this country than the entire population of Canada. And that if you include the people who are underinsured, more people than in the United Kingdom. We have huge numbers of people who are also just a lay-off away from joining the ranks of the uninsured, or being purged by their insurance company, and winding up there.

And another thing is that the advocates of reform or the opponents of reform are those who are saying that we need to be careful about what we do here, because we don't want the government to take away your choice of a health plan. It's more likely that your employer and your insurer is going to switch you from a plan that you're in now to one that you don't want. You might be in the plan you like now.

But chances are, pretty soon, you're going to be enrolled in one of these high deductible plans in which you're going to find that much more of the cost is being shifted to you than you ever imagined.

Timothy Foley Tim has been an online organizer and blogger on health care policy for the Obama for America campaign and the Committee of Interns and Residents/SEIU Healthcare.
PREVIOUS STORY:
On Miscommunication
NEXT STORY:
Why I'm Asking Aetna to Cover My Surgery

COMMENTS (2)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.