Weekly Highlights June 7-14

by Alanna Shaikh · 2009-06-14 10:43:00 UTC

(photo credit: Steve Jackson)

This week, global health guide Alanna Shaikh explored two important and interesting topics in reproductive rights. First, she explained how Emergency Contraception is Not Abortion, because while it prevents pregnancy, it cannot end one. Second, she explained the (almost) good sterilization method of Quinacrine in her post, Global Health Controversies: Quinacrine.

Guest blogger Michael Keizer has written several posts on health and human rights. This week, Michael responds to economist Bill Easterly's provocative claim that poverty is not a human rights violation in his post, The Easterly Criteria for Human Rights. Michael argues that "[Easterley's] qualifications are problematic, because they depend on absolutes - and human rights rarely deal with such absolutes."

For Career Wednesday, Alanna gives some common sense warnings of Five Things Not to Do in a Job Interview. Also, as part of her series, "Interviews with a Global Health Professional", Alanna interviews Early Childhood Development Specialist, Anna Smeby. Read on to find out about her work with the youngest among us.

You may remember Alanna's article last week about the recent Cochrane review on Circumcision and HIV. If you were intrigued, confused or even offended by this issue, check out Alanna's update, Clarification on Circumcision Studies and guest blogger Steve Jacksons view on how Circumcision Is a Red Herring.

In other HIV news, Australian scientists have developed a CD4 Rapid Test, A cool new technology to monitor HIV. CD4 T-cells are a type of white blood cells attacked and invaded by HIV, so their concentration in the blood is a good indicator of how the immune system is doing, as well as when to start anti-retroviral treatment.

PREVIOUS STORY:
Refugee Resettlement in the US: Practical Ways to Help
NEXT STORY:
Campaign about Apple Factories in China Gains Wide and Diverse Support

COMMENTS (0)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.