Who The Bleep Do You Think You Are?

by Natasha Chart · 2009-05-27 11:40:00 UTC
Topics:

It sticks its tongue out; by LaenulfeanIf you read the comments here, you may have noticed a lot of pro-pesticide trolls showing up, the sort of people who think Michelle Obama's organic garden is an affront to Western Civilization.

You may have read comments from them on the order of, 'well, if you really cared about the (hungry/poor), you'd love pesticide,' or 'who are (any of you/these people) to raise these questions?' I'll get to the suitable response in a moment, but these questions are good at preying on the kinds of doubts and self-doubts that people can have coming up against all sorts of large, corporate lobbies who clearly don't mean well by us in spite of the Cheshire Cat grins.

Even Mark Bittman falls prey to these doubts, but as Ezra Klein said:

... If amateurs leave teaching physics to the experts, then physics gets taught by the experts. That's a good thing. And in the perfect world, we'd leave farm policy to the experts too, and the experts would make our farm policy. But we don't live in the perfect world. And so when we leave farm policy to the experts, we actually leave it to the lobbyists. And this is true for a lot of second or third-tier issues. The only people who spend their days bugging Washington to implement their policy preferences are the people who are paid to do so. Most people don't care about those issues. Others care a bit but spend their time elsewhere. And others care a lot but don't feel they possess the technical expertise.

That's true, they don't. They shouldn't be policy czar. But no one is offering them that position. And providing expertise to policymakers is just one of many roles. Another is to provide a non-industry perspective. Another is to provide evidence of a grassroots constituency for proper action. Another is to communicate basic ideas clearly (Congressmen are not always experts themselves). ...

And I think what people owe these smiling defenders of the status quo isn't more doubt and self-effacement, it's their own question right back at them.

Because who the bleep are they besides the very people who gave us the the unredressed Union Carbide pesticide plant disaster in Bhopal and Agent Orange. That's their credential, their expertise, their experience. Don't let them suggest otherwise and play the big altruists when they say that they just want to help.

They're in business to sell poison. They hire PR people to discredit those who raise questions about how poisonous their products actually are. They even come up with ingenious strategies to enlist national governments in marketing their poisons to farmers and getting them hooked.

A drunk driver has more moral credibility than CropLife America, Monsanto and Dow Chemical at this point, though they'll try to intimidate you into thinking otherwise.

(Photo credit: Laenulfean on Flickr.)

PREVIOUS STORY:
School Lunch: Bad On Purpose
NEXT STORY:
Join the Social Media Day of Action to Rid Girl Scout Cookies of Forest-Destroying Palm Oil

COMMENTS (18)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.