Who Will Direct the White House Office of Social Innovation?

by Nathaniel Whittemore · 2009-02-16 13:34:00 UTC

President Obama deep in thought - perhaps about who to choose?

There is an increasing level of buzz and excitement around the not-quite-there-yet White House Office of Social Innovation (or is it the White House Office of Social Innovation and Civic Engagement?). The idea has been promoted (including on this blog during the Ideas for Change competition) by a number of actors, including the America Forward social entrepreneur coalition.

The important thing about it is that the Office would elevate a position related to nonprofits to the White House-level. Previously, the highest position of this type was the director of the Corporation for National and Community Service. This would give more voice if not necessarily huge new resources to civil society organizations.

The big speculation lately has been regarding the identity of the director of this new office. A must-read post by Todd Cohen today has lots of important thoughts about not only who might take the job but whether they'll be good for the nonprofit sector as a whole.

So with big hat-tips to John Kelly of Youth Today, Andrew Wolk of Root Cause, Todd Cohen of Inside Philanthropy, Peter Kafka of MediaMemo, and Rick Cohen of the Nonprofit Quarterly, here are the seemingly leading candidates:

Sonal Shah

Seemingly the leading contender, Google.org's Sonal Shah has a long and diverse record in the social change arena. She has worked with the Department of the Treasury and World Bank/IMF on issues related to debt relief and development in Africa. She consulted to help rebuild the banking system in Kosovo and Bosnia. Recently, she's worked for the Center for Global Development as well as the Center for American Progress. Since 2007 she's overseen Google.org's international development efforts, including a particular focused on growing small and medium size enterprises.

Ian Rowe

Last week, Root Cause founder Andrew Wolk wrote that he heard that Ian Rowe would be taking the reigns. Ian Rowe has a laundry list of things that relate him to the field of social entrepreneurship. He has worked with Teach for America, has been an Echoing Green Fellow and was a 2007 Knight News Challenge Winner. He was in director of Strategy and Performance Measurement for USA Freedom Corps at the White House. Most recently, he's worked as vice president of Strategic Partnerships and Public Affairs for MTV, where he's worked on the Think MTV initiative that works to spread awareness of global social issues.

Katie Jacobs Stanton

Katie Jacobs Stanton works in New Business Development at Google and has been involved in developing the Open Social Initiative, Google Finance, and the "Moderator" tool that allowed users to ask questions during the presidential debates and was later used on the transition site Change.gov.

The buzz around Jacobs Stanton hasn't been in the name of the "Office of Social Innovation" but as the nebulous "director of citizen participation." Peter Kafka of MediaMatters broke that news on January 28th and paidContent.org confirmed it. What relationship this position has to the Office of Social Innovation isn't defined but it's easy to see how they might be connected in some way.

Nathaniel Whittemore is the founder of Assetmap. Previously he was the founding director of the Northwestern University Center for Global Engagement.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Twe2 Brings SMS Back to Twitter's Global Users, Activists Rejoice
NEXT STORY:
Facing Forward: The End of the Social Entrepreneurship Blog on Change.org

COMMENTS (4)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.