Why We Should Be Jealous of the EU's Organic Labels

by Sarah Parsons · 2010-07-02 09:51:00 UTC

The European Union gets a big star—well, 12 big stars actually. Beginning this week, the EU's "Euro-Leaf" organic food labels go into effect. The label, which is now mandatory on all pre-packaged, organic foods, features a green label with a leaf made up of 12 stars. The EU Commission for Agriculture and Rural Development hopes the obligatory logo will boost organic farming and draw consumers to organic products.

The mandatory labeling system applies to all pre-packaged, organic foods produced in any of the EU's 27 Member States. In addition to featuring the "Euro-Leaf," labels must list the farms where products' ingredients were produced as well as the code number of the regulatory body that certified the item as organic. Operators have a two-year transition period to comply with the new labeling laws.

As a regular consumer of organic goods, the EU's super green labels make me pea-green with envy. In the U.S., it's easy to seek out products with an organic label. But what isn't so transparent is where ingredients in organic items came from. Take Trader Joe's, which I've blogged about before. The grocery store offers a bevvy of organic goods under its Trader Joe's brand, everything from frozen pizza to milk to eggs. But despite flack from shoppers, the chain adamantly refuses to disclose where it sources its organic goods from. And legally, the store doesn't have to divulge anything.

And here lies my problem with organic labeling in the U.S. Eating organic means eliminating chemical pesticides and herbicides and purchasing products that were produced in an ecologically friendly manner. But another fundamental principle that oftentimes gets overlooked is this idea of connecting consumers with where their food comes from. Organic labels should provide complete transparency in ingredients' origins, down to the very farm where milk, eggs, veggies, etc. were sourced. After all, you can tell me my milk is organic, but if I'm completely in the dark about what dairy operation it came from, how is there any accountability? New "Euro-Leaf" labels provide that accountability.

I'm impressed by the EU's efforts here, and it would be great if the U.S. adopted similar measures. But in one regard, "Euro-Leaf" labels really don't go far enough. While the labels are mandatory for all goods produced in EU Member States, they remain optional for imported products. Complete transparency would require listing information on where all organic goods come from. For example, a while back, ABC News called out Whole Foods for selling "California Blend" frozen veggies under its 365 Organic label that actually came from farms in China. If an organic label right on the front of the item displayed the fact that those "California" veggies actually came from China, I doubt ecologically minded consumers would put them in their shopping carts. The veggies may be certified organic, but the amount of carbon emissions created by shipping frozen veggies from China to the U.S. is nauseating. Plus, the USDA recently fired its organic certifier in China after information revealed that the organization hired individuals from Chinese government agencies to inspect farms and processing plants that are controlled by the state. Kind of a conflict of interest, don't you think? This is the type of information shoppers should be entitled to receive right on the front of organic products.

U.S. consumers go out of their way to seek out organic products and shell out the extra dough to buy them. Like EU shoppers, we should be entitled to mandatory labels listing where this food comes from.

Photo credit: Samuell via Wikimedia Commons

Sarah Parsons is Change.org's Sustainable Food Editor. Her work has appeared in Popular Science, OnEarth, Audubon and Plenty.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Britain's New Health Minister Lambasts Jamie Oliver
NEXT STORY:
Join the Social Media Day of Action to Rid Girl Scout Cookies of Forest-Destroying Palm Oil

COMMENTS (0)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.