Why We Should "Re-Brand" the Word "School"

by Clay Burell · 2009-04-09 07:04:00 UTC

One of the books I'm reading right now is Richard E. Nisbett's The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently . . . and Why.¹ I had to drop it to share this passage with you:

Our word "school" comes from the Greek scholē, meaning "leisure." Leisure meant for the Greeks, among other things, the freedom to pursue knowledge. The merchants of Athens were happy to send their sons to school so that they could indulge their curiosity (Nisbett, 4).

Arne Duncan wants to "re-brand" No Child Left Behind by renaming it (but keeping its essence of high-stakes, high-pressure tests). He also wants, he says this week, to lengthen the school day, week, and year - six days a week, at least 11 months a year — if American students are to compete² with students abroad³ (says the AP).

Sort of makes me think we need to re-name "School." What we have now is certainly no thing of leisure and the indulging of curiosity.

So what's the new name, the new brand?

It's on the tip of my tongue. Starts with a "w." CEO runs it, businessmen shape it, marketing and branding are everything (so is "incenting"). It competes in test-score production, even pays some of its charges for good attendance and grades now. What's that thing called?

Of course: "Workplace."

--

¹ That my wife of little more than a year is Korean has absolutely nothing to do with that choice. I swear.
² Does anybody else hear Bush telling Americans to go shopping after 9/11 when they hear Obama and Duncan discuss education in terms of "competition in the global economy"? We've gone from "Go shopping!" to "Work harder!"
³ Though in all fairness, he wants to use those longer days for more arts and other non-academic pursuits.

PREVIOUS STORY:
Google Earth Adds 3-D Tour of Ancient Rome
NEXT STORY:
Student loans got you down? Start a petition.

COMMENTS (4)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.